NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2013, 07:35 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,200
Default Renowned Photo Auctioneer Henry Yee to Partner with Rogers Photo Archive

I am honored to help announce this new partnership of Henry Yee and Rogers Photo Archive. Both John and Henry are hobby friends and I certainly wish them the best. It's an exciting time in the photo hobby.

__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:02 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

I love Henry and have nothing but good things to say about him and wish him the the absolute best of luck in ANYTHING he does. As for the author of the press release, interesting timing to announce a partnership that has existed for over six months and pretty classless but that is just my opinion.

Best of luck to Henry, he is a hobby friend and a great guy!
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:28 PM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,122
Default

Heh...great, now I'll pay three times as much as I was paying for my photos from John Rogers.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:39 PM
Griffins Griffins is offline
Anth๘ny N. ex
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prewarsports View Post
As for the author of the press release, interesting timing to announce a partnership that has existed for over six months and pretty classless but that is just my opinion.
I'm a bit lost on this part. Who is the author of the press release (not seeing a byline) and why is he classless to announce it 6 months later?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-03-2013, 03:37 AM
gnaz01's Avatar
gnaz01 gnaz01 is offline
Gr3g N@z@r3th
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffins View Post
I'm a bit lost on this part. Who is the author of the press release (not seeing a byline) and why is he classless to announce it 6 months later?
Because the author indirectly references Rhys's classification system
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-03-2013, 07:47 AM
Lordstan's Avatar
Lordstan Lordstan is offline
M@rk V3l@rd3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnaz01 View Post
Because the author indirectly references Rhys's classification system
Not so much indirectly as straight forward calling Rhys' system "clearly less accurate and far inferior." While the pros and cons of any system(s) are debatable, it's a little cheesey to come out with these comments right as Rhys' auction is about to go off.
For the record, I like parts of each system and have nothing negative to say about Henry, Rhys, or Rogers. I have had a couple dealings with each and have never had a problem or issue.
I wish them all well in their individual ventures.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress).
https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy

Other interests/sets/collectibles.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums

My for sale or trade photobucket album
https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-03-2013, 08:00 AM
aaroncc's Avatar
aaroncc aaroncc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 576
Default

I think the quotes in the article were harsh. The so-called revolutionary system.. To me thats pretty direct and not necessary. I agree the systems have flaws but to argue my system is better because I can guess closer to the real date is really not a strong point.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:24 AM
Hankphenom Hankphenom is offline
Hank Thomas
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,494
Default

Wishing Henry and John all the best. For lovers of vintage photos, it's exciting to imagine what might be coming out of these archives.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-03-2013, 02:26 PM
D. Bergin's Avatar
D. Bergin D. Bergin is offline
Dave
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 6,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnaz01 View Post
Because the author indirectly references Rhys's classification system

Ah, I was wondering that also until I read the press release further. I prefer the system Rhys uses myself to be honest. It's actually more accurate if you understand photos and know the type classification system is riddled with holes, and plenty of leaps in faith familiar in the game used and autograph categories.

The only advantage of the type system is easier monetization of many of those leaps of faith, and something else PSA can charge you for.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-03-2013, 03:42 PM
HRBAKER's Avatar
HRBAKER HRBAKER is offline
Jeff
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 5,255
Default

the type classification system is riddled with holes, and plenty of leaps in faith familiar in the game used and autograph categories.


Amen, and amen.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page

HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos

"Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years."
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-03-2013, 05:17 PM
Forever Young's Avatar
Forever Young Forever Young is offline
Weingarten's Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Bergin View Post
Ah, I was wondering that also until I read the press release further. I prefer the system Rhys uses myself to be honest. It's actually more accurate if you understand photos and know the type classification system is riddled with holes, and plenty of leaps in faith familiar in the game used and autograph categories.

The only advantage of the type system is easier monetization of many of those leaps of faith, and something else PSA can charge you for.
It is very interesting how this thread went after the second post. My simple question is to EVERYONE/ ANYONE : how is the other system more accurate than the type system? I see no benefit AT ALL. NONE. ZERO. Someone who understands photos please eplain this to me. Please please please
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls."
~Ted Grant


Www.weingartensvintage.com

https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage

http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten

ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:43 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

I will say this really quick as I was not going to post again but I will just to specify one thing. People are entitled to their own opinions and I respect that. Had I not been insulted publicly I would have said nothing AT ALL.

FIRST, the "Type" system is copyrighted. If I could have gotten a written permission to freely use it, I would have just used it and made extra comments about each photo where I felt it needed clarification. This was not possible so thats that!

SECOND, My system (which took years to develop after looking at over 1 million photos) is very comprehensive and brings something new to the hobby and I will tell you why. Should photos that are 2 years old be worth more than those made 5 years after? YES! Problem is, unless you have a photo with a paper caption and/or a date stamp (that is not FAKED) you only have the paper stock and a news service stamp to go off of. Back stamps were used for a number of years, sometimes as much as 10-15 years in some cases. Right now if ALL you have is a company stamp on the back that was used during the right year and nothing else, its a type 1. What is happening in the hobby, and I have seen it hundreds upon hundreds of times, is that people who have a photo that would otherwise be a "Type 2" because it is say 5 years after the original but the company stamp is the same one as would have been used to make it a "Type 1" are ripping off paper labels and destroying damning evidence while keeping good evidence to pass off a photo as a "type 1" and NOBODY (not me, not Henry NOBODY) can tell.


Example, lets say you have a 1939 Lou Gehrig Luckiest man Speech Photo. The "Acme" or "UP" label is the same one as used in 1939, but the back has a date stamp of 1944 and a paper caption that talks about "Five years ago on this date Gehrig makes his famous speech". With the label and date intact its a "Type 2" and worth maybe 100-200 bucks. Destroy the label and get rid of the date somehow and you now have a "Type 1" that is worth 1000+ bucks. In a hobby where fraud is the norm, THIS IS HAPPENING and it is happening A LOT!

My system is designed to do 2 things and otherwise it is the same as the "Type" system. Deter fraud, and more accurately (in my opinion) distinguish between "Type 2-4" photos. Thats it. End of Story. It is not "Revolutionary" it just is a step (in my opinion) to clarifying a few loopholes that I discovered as a COLLECTOR of photography and a step to try (futile as it may be) to clean up some of the fraud in the industry that I love.

In a perfect world the type system is great. Problem is, its not a perfect World and the collectibles arena is filled with dirty people.






Last thing. I applaud Marshall Fogel and Henry Yee for pioneering this industry. I am walking in their footsteps and I am aware of that and respect and admire both men more than any of you will probably ever know. If not for them and their book, I am not where I am today and I cant thank them enough. I AM NOT saying my system is "better" just that I believe it is more comprehensive and deters fraud, thats it. I am not insulting anyone, I took a system that they created because of a need in the hobby and tweaked it just a tiny bit.

I wish Henry all the luck in the World with his new venture and I hope it brings him happiness in his life, he deserves it as he is a great guy and someone I consider to be a good friend. I would never say anything bad about him and I know that he personally would say the same about me. There is plenty of room for more than one seller of vintage photos and you will NEVER see me take shots at him or anything he does for the betterment of my own company and I will do my best (as I have already spoken to him about this over the phone personally) to stagger my auctions away from him to not compete and I will never take a shot at him, PSA/DNA or anything. I would encourage anyone and everyone to do as much business with HIM as possible.



If anyone wishes to discuss anything with me and my "vastly inferior, fly by night, needless, archaic, system" please e mail me and I will give you my personal number to call and discuss it.

Rhys
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com

Last edited by prewarsports; 10-03-2013 at 09:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-03-2013, 10:45 PM
Forever Young's Avatar
Forever Young Forever Young is offline
Weingarten's Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prewarsports View Post
I will say this really quick as I was not going to post again but I will just to specify one thing. People are entitled to their own opinions and I respect that. Had I not been insulted publicly I would have said nothing AT ALL.

FIRST, the "Type" system is copyrighted. If I could have gotten a written permission to freely use it, I would have just used it and made extra comments about each photo where I felt it needed clarification. This was not possible so thats that!

SECOND, My system (which took years to develop after looking at over 1 million photos) is very comprehensive and brings something new to the hobby and I will tell you why. Should photos that are 2 years old be worth more than those made 5 years after? YES! Problem is, unless you have a photo with a paper caption and/or a date stamp (that is not FAKED) you only have the paper stock and a news service stamp to go off of. Back stamps were used for a number of years, sometimes as much as 10-15 years in some cases. Right now if ALL you have is a company stamp on the back that was used during the right year and nothing else, its a type 1. What is happening in the hobby, and I have seen it hundreds upon hundreds of times, is that people who have a photo that would otherwise be a "Type 2" because it is say 5 years after the original but the company stamp is the same one as would have been used to make it a "Type 1" are ripping off paper labels and destroying damning evidence while keeping good evidence to pass off a photo as a "type 1" and NOBODY (not me, not Henry NOBODY) can tell.


Example, lets say you have a 1939 Lou Gehrig Luckiest man Speech Photo. The "Acme" or "UP" label is the same one as used in 1939, but the back has a date stamp of 1944 and a paper caption that talks about "Five years ago on this date Gehrig makes his famous speech". With the label and date intact its a "Type 2" and worth maybe 100-200 bucks. Destroy the label and get rid of the date somehow and you now have a "Type 1" that is worth 1000+ bucks. In a hobby where fraud is the norm, THIS IS HAPPENING and it is happening A LOT!

My system is designed to do 2 things and otherwise it is the same as the "Type" system. Deter fraud, and more accurately (in my opinion) distinguish between "Type 2-4" photos. Thats it. End of Story. It is not "Revolutionary" it just is a step (in my opinion) to clarifying a few loopholes that I discovered as a COLLECTOR of photography and a step to try (futile as it may be) to clean up some of the fraud in the industry that I love.

In a perfect world the type system is great. Problem is, its not a perfect World and the collectibles arena is filled with dirty people.






Last thing. I applaud Marshall Fogel and Henry Yee for pioneering this industry. I am walking in their footsteps and I am aware of that and respect and admire both men more than any of you will probably ever know. If not for them and their book, I am not where I am today and I cant thank them enough. I AM NOT saying my system is "better" just that I believe it is more comprehensive and deters fraud, thats it. I am not insulting anyone, I took a system that they created because of a need in the hobby and tweaked it just a tiny bit.

I wish Henry all the luck in the World with his new venture and I hope it brings him happiness in his life, he deserves it as he is a great guy and someone I consider to be a good friend. I would never say anything bad about him and I know that he personally would say the same about me. There is plenty of room for more than one seller of vintage photos and you will NEVER see me take shots at him or anything he does for the betterment of my own company and I will do my best (as I have already spoken to him about this over the phone personally) to stagger my auctions away from him to not compete and I will never take a shot at him, PSA/DNA or anything. I would encourage anyone and everyone to do as much business with HIM as possible.



If anyone wishes to discuss anything with me and my "vastly inferior, fly by night, needless, archaic, system" please e mail me and I will give you my personal number to call and discuss it.

Rhys
Rhys, How is the type 2-4 any different? You do the same thing using more steps. All the type system photos are dated so your vintage 1-3 does nothing but add more classifications. That goes for type 3s too...dated. So the wire vintage vs the other is also creating another classification. Am i wrong here? please help me understand. Also, it is not more comprehensive to make a range of a type 1 bigger at all. The example in the article was good but here are actually countless better.
Also..what does this even mean? "In a perfect world the type system is great. Problem is, its not a perfect World and the collectibles arena is filled with dirty people." Are you saying yours is a perfect system in a non perfect world?? I mean.. The grading in condition is promoting fraud more than anything. You have a buck weaver as a 5/5. What stops someone from trimming a full size image down to get this high grade? Also, what stops someone from tearing off a caption six or seven years later to get your type 1 classification. Answer.. Nothing. Fraud exists in cards, autos, game used, photos ect. I see nothing here that makes it any less.
When a system is copied(with a few things changed to avoid copyright)and calls itself more comprehensive when it is not.. It is a problem imo. As you said, we are all entitled to our opinion but man... I never saw Henry or PSA go on your marketing thread and say anything about copying or classless. I mean.. You compare the type system within each definition of the one on your site. You basically copied it and then called yours more thorough and comprehensive with the only real change being the 2 to 5 years. Then when this release copes out...you get upset and throw classless around? Come on Rhys ..I'm just saying. You seem like a good guy from the convos we have had and very knowledgeable and I wish you the best. However, I do not agree that your system is at all tweaked in a positive way or done in a positive manner. As you know, that didn't stop me from bidding and have wished you the best in your auction from day 1. I, will also open an invitation if you or anyone wants to talk more about this subject. Unfortunately, this thread went off the track at post 2. Good luck to Henry and Rodgers. Henry will add a lot to that group. I am always excited to see fresh images introduced the hobby. Ps: sorry for run-ons..spelling errors ect.. I am tired and this iPad sucks. Peace
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls."
~Ted Grant


Www.weingartensvintage.com

https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage

http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten

ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection

Last edited by Forever Young; 10-03-2013 at 11:19 PM. Reason: Added more crazy run-on iPad talk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-03-2013, 11:21 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,651
Default

...
__________________
$co++ Forre$+

Last edited by Runscott; 10-03-2013 at 11:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-03-2013, 11:49 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

I hear ya Ben. People can disagree. No I am in no way saying my system is perfect and I am pretty sure you know that, all I meant was that in a perfect world we wouldn't need 3rd party graders to tell us if a card has been altered, an autograph has been forged etc. But since we live in an imperfect world we need to try and prevent as much fraud as possible and all I am trying to do (whether you agree or disagree) is get rid of some of that.

I have three classes "Vintage 1-3" and that is it, each based on how old the photo is. I had to come up with SOMETHING since I couldn't use the PSA system so I came up with the system that I personally like better as a collector. I dont expect everyone to like it, and you dont have to endorse it or use it and thats fine. I just hope everyone, including you can see what I am trying to do to make this hobby more positive for all involved.

One more FYI, I am just responding to someone who publicly attacked my credibility and threw it out for the world to see. He made statements which are flat out not true, and made other statements that I could completely discredit in about 2 seconds. It was NOT cool and completely a series of low blows to try and hit me 4 days before my auction ends because he views us as competition. I WOULD NEVER do anything like that for any reason, but since it was done to me I am simply trying to say a few words and take the high road. Had the article been in good taste, I would have simply gone on and said, "Best of luck" and the story is over. Please keep this in mind when reading any of my three posts in this thread and imagine what you would do if someone lied about you, your business and your integrity on a public forum in the name of "Business".

I wont post anymore on this thread and I never intended to hijack it, but when someone lies and calls you out, you are entitled to at least say a few words, at least in my opinion.

Best of luck to Henry Yee on his new venture. I will be bidding and endorsing it to all I know!

Rhys
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2013, 10:33 AM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forever Young View Post
Unfortunately, this thread went off the track at post 2. Good luck to Henry and Rodgers. Henry will add a lot to that group. I am always excited to see fresh images introduced the hobby. Ps: sorry for run-ons..spelling errors ect.. I am tired and this iPad sucks. Peace
Ben, it got off track at Post 1. That news release is blatantly unprofessional. I'm surprised Henry allowed it, based on all the praise he has received on this board.

You know my thoughts regarding the type system, PSA's photo slabbing, and supposed 'industry standards' with regard to describing photos, etc. As we discussed, most of use who were knowledgeable vintage photo collectors prior to this system's creation, didn't need it in order to collect 'safely', and many of us (me, at least) thought/think it flawed and felt that it introduced fraud opportunities that didn't exist prior to its inception, but you and I disagree on that, and that's fine. But it's here and all the newer collectors expect photos to have a 'Type' designation. Describing something as 'Original' isn't enough for them, and they might even figure you are hiding something if you don't say 'Type x'. Still, I don't personally use it. Rhys, on the other hand, has explained why he feels that something had to be done. I disagree with him on that point, but he's running a new, large photo auction, and he's thinking about this from a different perspective.

One more point regarding 'type' designations: just as with the autograph TPAs situation, photo type systems were not created for me or for any other knowledgeable collector, but I agree with you that they ARE beneficial for their intended market - I just think that most of the people in that market are better off collecting something else. If you quit using some of your brainpower because you are letting PSA do your thinking for you, then you are asking for trouble. I will also admit that if I were ever to view a hyee auction, and was looking for original photos, it would make things easier for me to be able to search for 'Type I', then focus more by looking for alterations, correctness of stamping, image quality - basically, anything I would have looked for BEFORE the type system was created. But it would make things quicker. Of course, if he put 'original' in the subject line, for me personally, it would accomplish the same thing.

I will use the same method when viewing RMY auction items. Taking as an example John Roger's 1932-35 'Ruth Shot' photo that he uses to attack Rhys' credibility, SO WHAT? As a knowledgeable collector, I will look at the photo and USE MY BRAIN to make my own decisions. If I'm buying stuff based totally on a 'designator' (either PSA's or Rhys'), and spending thousands of dollars, then I am an idiot. John has lost his mind if he really expects people to make decisions that way. At the very least, he's insulting the intelligence of his market.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-04-2013, 10:45 AM
David R's Avatar
David R David R is offline
David R
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 349
Default

Shouldn't this thread be over on the memorabilia side?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-04-2013, 10:46 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David R View Post
Shouldn't this thread be over on the memorabilia side?
No
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-04-2013, 10:59 AM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,720
Default

Quote:
Ben, it got off track at Post 1. That news release is blatantly unprofessional. I'm surprised Henry allowed it, based on all the praise he has received on this board.
Exactly. As noted, utterly classless.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-04-2013, 04:01 PM
HRBAKER's Avatar
HRBAKER HRBAKER is offline
Jeff
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 5,255
Default

I agree the systems have flaws but to argue my system is better because I can guess closer to the real date is really not a strong point.

My thoughts as well.
Well stated.

At the end of the day these systems whether applied to cards or autographs or photographs are not so much about accuracy but liquidity IMO.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page

HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos

"Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years."

Last edited by HRBAKER; 10-04-2013 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New photo archive site has some interesting images for sale, cheaply. baseball tourist Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 1 01-31-2011 07:38 AM
Henry Chadwick tin type photo nyyanksghr Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 54 06-17-2009 03:03 PM
Photo archive to prove Provenace? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 05-01-2008 01:07 PM
OT: Christies/Baseball Magazine Archive Photo's Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 13 02-13-2005 02:02 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 PM.


ebay GSB