|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Double X (Foxx) and Mantle Opinions
Would really appreciate opinions on these...I'm more skeptical on Mantle but I'm such an amateur compared to many here.
Thanks in advance, Joel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I am sort of torn on the Mantle I dont like the second m being so high up from the first. I dont like the slant on the cross of the t. It also looks sloppy. I would say no. On this one I could be wrong. I just would stay away.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with Shelly on Mantle . I would stay away from this, plus there are better examples of his available.
The Foxx looks ok to me. The big thing for Foxx is that he signed with many variations on the "J", and that can be an authentication nightmare. All else looks ok to me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Foxx
Foxx looks good to me but if it came from the same book as the Mantle beware I guess
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Good and good
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The Mantle sure is puzzling.
It has an unusual slant, which is especially evident in the "ckey." Also, spacing is very stretched out in Mantle. Look at the huge gap between the M and A. Overall, it has an almost "feminine" look. On the plus side, it was signed with good speed and the Ms look good. If it's a fake, it's a fairly deceptive one. I can't say definitively either way, but I'd have doubts about it.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The Mantle looks bad.
Going letter-by-letter isn't generally a great idea, but if an autograph just looks 'off', such a method sometimes yields an obviously bad letter. To me, this one is an obvious stinker, but my ego is small enough that I don't mind being proven wrong.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 12-16-2014 at 10:33 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
It is too well done
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I went ahead and bought this piece for the following reasons:
a) It fits my purpose--custom cut card that I'll build...cheaper, smallish and I'm not destroying something really cool b) If it was forged, its a style I have never seen before and it just seems highly unlikely that someone that "skilled" wouldn't have created more It's not the greatest but basically the positives outweighed the negatives. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I'll post high res scans when it's in hand.
If I'm dumb, I'm dumb. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Joel,
Another good hint that something is a forgery: if you are able to purchase it for 50-70% of what a similar item would normally go for.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Last edited by ATP; 12-17-2014 at 02:58 PM. Reason: Typo |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Jeff - I am not sure anymore what a JSA letter means.
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
You mentioned that the guy sells Ruths. I figured a look at his Ruths would clear up pretty quickly what we are dealing with, and it has.
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Im a newbie and I do love how all disscussions turn to ruth...it does make for a fun forum from night in to night out!...haha
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Jeff, I wouldn't worry too much about it. There is some frustration because someone is selling forged Ruths and likely screwed Joel on that Mantle. All of this is occurring in an environment where the knowledge is present abd it's right in your face. If you think YOU want to leave, how do you think someone like Shelly would geel? He has nothing to gain by posting here, nor do I, as we aren't concerned about buying a fake Mantle or Ruth. We are simply sharing knowlede. If all you need is a JSA letter, then you are golden.
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry about spelling - on phone
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on a Jimmie Foxx autograph | Sportsnutcards | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 05-28-2014 06:47 PM |
Jimmie Foxx Baseball Opinions | Real or fake? | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 12-07-2013 06:59 PM |
Mantle Opinions | Wymers Auction | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 11-09-2013 11:52 AM |
1950's Ball W/ Foxx, Mantle, Stengel, Williams...all ID'd now. Thx! | ATP | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 06-09-2013 10:25 PM |
1966 topps double punchout mickey mantle jim ray hart | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 11-17-2011 05:00 PM |