NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

View Poll Results: Favorite Topps Set 1956, 1965, 1971
1956 67 65.69%
1965 19 18.63%
1971 16 15.69%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2015, 11:25 AM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default Vote: Favorite Topps Set ! 1956, 1965, 1971

Over the past few weeks we have voted for our favorite Topps sets from each decade. The winners 1956, 1965 and 1971 will now square off to get us a very unscientific overall winner. The sets should be your favorite for whatever reason you determine, obviously the 1952 Topps is the most expensive but based on the voters own criteria it lost out to the 1956 set.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2015, 11:39 AM
pawpawdiv9's Avatar
pawpawdiv9 pawpawdiv9 is offline
Chr!$ M!ll!c@n
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: GA
Posts: 2,735
Default

hands down 56
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads
Need: Ping Bodie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2015, 03:27 PM
MacDice MacDice is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 725
Default

1957
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2015, 03:38 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,914
Default

Out of those 3, I chose 56. By decade my vote would have been 53, 60, and 75.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2015, 06:21 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

All great sets but between the three 56 has got too much going for it. Classic 50's look, all the great stars with overlap of legends careers (Campy, Jackie R., Feller, Williams still in and Koufax, Clemente, Aaron, Banks just starting).
Also 10% of cards are HOFers. Only down side in no Musial.

Once the tally is done on this one we should do the same thing except the most ugly set from each decade then go head to head to see how far 1968, I mean, which ever set is looked upon the least by collectors.

Drew
__________________
Drew
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2015, 09:53 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

A glance at each years Clemente.... some nice looking cards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 56.jpg (20.5 KB, 305 views)
File Type: jpg 65.jpg (11.7 KB, 307 views)
File Type: jpg 71.jpg (28.6 KB, 310 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:00 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by almostdone View Post

Once the tally is done on this one we should do the same thing except the most ugly set from each decade then go head to head to see how far 1968, I mean, which ever set is looked upon the least by collectors.

Drew
Good idea Drew... I'll let you take the lead on the worst. I'm not a big fan of '58 or '59 so add those to your 68's
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:43 PM
rsn1661 rsn1661 is offline
Rich Nelson
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Lima, Ohio
Posts: 172
Default

I love the 71 set. I started collecting in 70 and have about half the 70 set and only need about 25 commons to finish the 71s.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:58 PM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,713
Default

Is the Topps " winner " going to be pitted against the 1953 Bowman set, which I believe a lot of us consider the best looking set produced.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-28-2015, 12:08 AM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,070
Default settle it once and for all...

Bicycle spoke death match, no slabs allowed, winner takes all!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-28-2015, 06:37 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KCRfan1 View Post
Is the Topps " winner " going to be pitted against the 1953 Bowman set, which I believe a lot of us consider the best looking set produced.
Only if you are talking about post war. T3, T206 and T205 are ahead of any post war set in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-28-2015, 10:38 AM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,713
Default

Sorry rats60, I should have been more clear. For those of you who are confused about the post I made in the Post War forum about the Topps voting between the 56, 65, and 71 set as the best Post War Topps set, I ( at the time, not so sure now ) thought it might be interesting to pit the winner of the Post War Topps set against the Post War 53 Bowman set. Many of us, I believe, consider the 53 Bowman one of the best sets produced, Post War. And I will stand by my belief that it is one of the best sets produced period, regardless of year. But to each their own....Pre War, Post War- we all have our passions and own opinions.

Have a good day.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-29-2015, 04:20 AM
MCoxon MCoxon is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 241
Default Best set among 56, 65, 71

I voted '56.

That said, to me the 1971 set is the most aesthetically pleasing set ever from Topps. It's got an amazing mix of action shots (Vada Pinson, Thurman Munson, Nolan Ryan) and great poses (Clemente, Rose). It also has a majority of the '60s hall of famers (Aaron, Mays, Clemente, F. Robinson, B. Robinson, B. Gibson) and a ton of the new blood players (Rose, Ryan, Reggie Jackson, Seaver)

But for a collector, I think you have to go with the '56 set as the most iconic because of the colors, the last year of the larger card size, the mix of actions and pose on the same card, and the great player examples. Easily the best Mantle and the best Clemente cards every from Topps, and maybe the best Mays and the best Aaron (not in value, obviously with the '52 Mantle and the Mays/Clemente/Aaron rookies, but on pure aesthetics)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-29-2015, 08:55 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default

Of the three, 1956. The best set of cards ever made.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-30-2015, 04:56 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default Trivia - Re Poll

Name the 2 guys that were in all 3 sets (1956, 1965, 1971), each with a different team (there might be more than 2 but through exhaustive research, I found only 2 guys). Name them.

Last edited by Gr8Beldini; 06-30-2015 at 05:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-30-2015, 08:04 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gr8Beldini View Post
Name the 2 guys that were in all 3 sets (1956, 1965, 1971), each with a different team (there might be more than 2 but through exhaustive research, I found only 2 guys). Name them.
Hoyt Wilhelm and Gil Hodges.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-30-2015, 08:30 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Hoyt Wilhelm and Gil Hodges.
yup.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-30-2015, 10:13 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gr8Beldini View Post
Name the 2 guys that were in all 3 sets (1956, 1965, 1971), each with a different team (there might be more than 2 but through exhaustive research, I found only 2 guys). Name them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Hoyt Wilhelm and Gil Hodges.
Correct... but I just thought of a 3rd guy. Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-30-2015, 11:52 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gr8Beldini View Post
Correct... but I just thought of a 3rd guy. Anyone?
Luis Aparicio.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-30-2015, 01:09 PM
brob28's Avatar
brob28 brob28 is offline
Bi11..R0berts
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,134
Default

'56
'71
'65 in that order for me.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-30-2015, 02:58 PM
brewing's Avatar
brewing brewing is offline
Br.ent !ngr@m
Br.ent Ing@am
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,100
Default

56 then 71. 65 does nothing for me
__________________
Tiger collector
Need: T204 McIntyre
Monster Number 519/520
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-30-2015, 05:45 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default

What about Hank Aaron, Roberto Clemente, Willie Mays, Ernie Banks, Al Kaline who are also featured in all three sets.

Last edited by 1963Topps Set; 06-30-2015 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-30-2015, 05:48 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1963Topps Set View Post
What about Hank Aaron, Roberto Clemente, Willie Mays, Ernie Banks, Al Kaline who are also featured in all three sets.
His question was looking for the players who were not only in each set, but appearing in 3 different uniforms.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-30-2015, 07:20 PM
wheels56 wheels56 is offline
jason w.
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 30
Default

56. love. love. love. from a historical perspective, love 54. that was an awesome year for baseball and the USA more broadly.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-30-2015, 07:37 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default

With the name of Wheels56, I would of never guessed your favorite set! We're you able to complete this set? It is incredible!

Last edited by 1963Topps Set; 06-30-2015 at 07:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-30-2015, 08:41 PM
wheels56 wheels56 is offline
jason w.
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1963Topps Set View Post
With the name of Wheels56, I would of never guessed your favorite set! We're you able to complete this set? It is incredible!
:-) yep, it was the first thing I did when I got back into the hobby a few years ago. since then, I have been steadily upgrading the HOFers. my first '56 was a total beater Ted Williams that my Dad gave me before he died. so, the set has deep sentimental value me as well.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-01-2015, 06:43 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default Interesting Trivia Part II

This one is pretty cool. See if you can figure out the guy that was in both 1956 and 1971 - both sets as a player (not manager)... but wasn't in the 1965 Topps set.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-01-2015, 10:33 AM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,737
Default

Dick Hall
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-01-2015, 11:15 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
Dick Hall
Please tell me you took some time trying to figure that one out. "Dick Hall" doesn't just pop into someone's head.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-01-2015, 01:03 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,737
Default

Just viewed the virtual '56 Gallery and saw his card. I knew he had a 1971 card--I liked his '70 and '71 cards-- so I had my answer.

Actually though I did this yesterday when searching for additional guys responsive to your question about the 56/65/71 sets. I was surprised and did not remember that Hall had no card in the 1965 Topps set, as I knew he had cards both before and after. He should have been included, coming off a 9-1 season with several saves and a sub-2.00 ERA.

Was also surprised that Al Dark missed the 1965 set, as he was all around it and in both '56 and '71 sets. I did not know he had been fired after 1964's 90-72 season because of what were wrongfully perceived as racist remarks about his players.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-02-2015, 11:35 PM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,790
Default

I went with 1956, although it was a real tough choice between that and 1971. If we do the worst set for each decade, my votes would probably be 1959, 1962, and 1970.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-04-2015, 12:00 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

Looks like we are going to have a clear cut winner here. I'm going to go ahead and call it!! The 1956 is the favorite Topps set of all time!!

I think I'll go out and build the set now.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-04-2015, 01:35 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 View Post
Looks like we are going to have a clear cut winner here. I'm going to go ahead and call it!! The 1956 is the favorite Topps set of all time!!

I think I'll go out and build the set now.
Could you wait a few months? I'm starting to make a good run at it and I don't need the extra competition.
Drew
__________________
Drew
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-04-2015, 03:18 PM
Cmount76's Avatar
Cmount76 Cmount76 is offline
Michael S.
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York State
Posts: 501
Default

'56 - not even close!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-04-2015, 08:28 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default

I have been saying this long before this pole!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-04-2015, 10:30 AM
Collectorsince62 Collectorsince62 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 168
Default

I was just going through my '56 set and, like many others in this poll, think it is the best Topps set ever. The action shots are they key. Sure, there are a lot of pitchers following through on the sidelines, but then you get game-action follow through shots like Koufax and Ford. Lots of home plate collisions and double play breakups. Imagine if Topps had featured the action shot on each card and relegated the bust shot to the background. '53 Bowman . . . please move over.

What's your favorite card in the set? I like the Jackie Robinson with a steal of home in the background.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-04-2015, 07:01 PM
bradmar48 bradmar48 is offline
Keith
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Texas
Posts: 242
Default

The 1956 set is my all time favorite probably because it was the first allmost full set I collected as a kid. Love the captions on the back and the action photos on the front. Anyone ever notice that on card #143 Jim Piersall you get a free Yogi Berra action photo on the front plus Willie Mays on the front of a Hank Aaron card..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-05-2015, 06:49 AM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Collectorsince62 View Post
What's your favorite card in the set? I like the Jackie Robinson with a steal of home in the background.
My 2 favorites are Mantle and Newcombe. Collecting cards in 1975, I thought these 2 cards were so cool when I first saw them on the 1956 MVPs card.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote for Your Favorite Post of the Year.... mrvster Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 30 12-27-2014 08:35 PM
1965 Topps - What is Your Favorite Card? Samsdaddy Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 24 12-24-2014 04:10 PM
1956 Topps...who's favorite summer??? Big Six Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 31 01-20-2013 07:04 PM
F/sale 1965 and 1971 topps roberto clemente jeff the moose 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 12-31-2011 01:48 PM
1953 Bowman Blog - Vote for your favorite card Dean's Cards Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 8 12-17-2009 01:59 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 AM.


ebay GSB