|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
JP ... you would have loved Gemany during the '30's .....
Quote:
Only your BS is allowed. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Potomac, I get that you don't like me because you have a misguided notion I'm a flipper. Fine, whatever.
But how is my bringing up PSA's inaccurate registry set composition BS? You do know what "BS" stands for, don't you? I've never seen so many people come into a thread and say "I don't care about the topic in this thread". If you don't like the topic, why not just read a different one and contribute there? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
JP - Your post is relevant in this forum IMO. However if you truly want to see the registry changed you should make a post on the PSA boards as well. If your post is written from the point of constructive change and not slamming PSA no one should have a problem with it over there.
I agree that given the information that is readily available today PSA should have a more accurate registry. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I hadn't even read this thread until just now. Are we having yet another fight? We are averaging several a day....and JP, why are you always in the middle of them? It can't just be coincidence.
And the amazing thing is Bruce is even around anymore. That was supposed to calm things down. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
No coincidence, Barry. I'm a target for a group of people in this forum. Making anything I say into controversy is their goal, and they are succeeding.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Tim, I'll think about it. If PSA doesn't like what I have to say, no matter how constructive, all future PSA submissions may suffer...even though all submissions are anonymous of course...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
JP,
Keep fighting the good fight. And by all means, keep posting. Please! Edited to add: No "hijacking" intended. Last edited by Rob D.; 04-05-2010 at 02:27 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
No idea if you're being serious...but I will always do whatever I can to become further educated, and help others further their collections through knowledge and resources. If I get mocked, then so be it. If you're being serious, thanks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hey guy, regarding your comments in Post #32......
I share my BB card knowledge with as many as I can. I am not "belittling" (to use your wording) you by asking this very basic and
straightforward question...... HOW MANY T206's DO YOU HAVE IN YOUR COLLECTION ? JIM R (and others) asked you a very basic and straightforward question in your other thread regarding your three BROAD LEAF 460 cards and you refused to answer that one, too. Do you understand how your responses (or none responses) are starting to grate against us, who are trying to have a dialogue with you ? Get that damn "chip off your shoulder" and try to be friendly....and, you'll see that some of us will reciprocate. TED Z |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
So what's the answer? How do we calm things down a little?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
No idea. I'm not a moderator so I can't control what others post. Maybe if people posted when they had something to contribute, and kept it at that, things would be different. Either that, or I just don't post anymore and someone else becomes the target of fraternal bullying. I believe all of my thread starters have been relevant, hobby-related issues, so I don't know what different I can do.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Barry - That questions has a pretty simple solution however implementing it is another matter.
JP like many others has become a lightening rod for a few that no matter how hobby related one of his posts may be, they will use the opportunity to post something sarcastic or get in a good zinger. If they don't like him, think he's a bad guy, think he's not knowledgeable, etc., then just don't post in his thread. For JP he needs to not respond to them. From time to time Bruce for example would start a thread with a good hobby related topic and before long the pilers on would be there to derail it. Once he responded the flame war was on and nothing of any baseball related substance could be expected after that. Last edited by Abravefan11; 04-05-2010 at 03:00 PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you're talking about my posts, you could not be more wrong. Certainly, I have had a disagreement or two with JP in the past. But none of them has anything to do with this thread. He started a thread complaining about a problem he sees in the hobby, yet he is willing to do absolutely nothing to fix this problem. He received several suggestions on how to address it and merely explained why he would not follow any of them. He won't post on the CU boards because they'll delete it. He won't write them an email because they won't respond. That's a silly approach. Instead, he attacked several people (one of whom had not even posted in the thread.) He seems to think he "owns" any thread he starts and, therefore, can control any opinions in this thread. In my opinion, you don't have a right to complain about a problem if you refuse to take even the simplest steps to remedy said problem.
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1971 PSA HOF, 68-79 PSA and some raw | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-05-2009 06:59 AM |
Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 10:05 AM |
T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED *NOW SOLD* | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 02-09-2008 10:16 AM |
PSA GRADED 1,2, & 3's 60 T206's NEW SALE PRICES | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2006 04:16 PM |
PSA Graded T-206's for Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 09-21-2006 09:19 PM |