NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2013, 05:59 AM
robsbessette robsbessette is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,175
Default 1966 Topps backs

Anyone know why some are lighter than others? I've always been curious but never really been able to figure out why.

I could see some really anal set collectors only going for one type.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running online collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2013, 06:04 AM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,987
Default

I have noticed this also....possibly Topps used slightly different types of card stock during production. Similar to 56, 59, 60 Topps and OPC issues.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2013, 08:03 AM
toppcat's Avatar
toppcat toppcat is offline
Dave.Horn.ish
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,811
Default

There's a lot of Topps issues with variations in coloration. I think it's some combo/interaction of cardboard and how far along in the press run a series was.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2013, 08:19 AM
goheels goheels is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 86
Default 1969 was worse than 1966

Later this morning I will post a picture in the other 68 blog going about the backs of the cards. In that year Topps ran out of stock and starting with the 3rd through 6th series used two different types of stock backs.

In the case of the 66s, I think it's a milder version of the 69s. The 69 color ranges from a deep salmon to a very light rose. I read where a collector with printing experience thought if they were cutting corners then they stretched the ink, sort of like not changing the toner on a xerox when the light first comes on.

And Topps was certainly cutting corners in 1969.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2013, 03:36 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,098
Default

Unless the color is a stock color available from an ink supplier -And most aren't- The ink is mixed by hand by the press operator according to a recepie sort of like paint gets mixed at the hardware store. (Only it's much gummier, so the mixing is done with a putty knife instead of a shaker)

So there are lots of reasons the ink might be lighter or darker.

Cardboard color makes a difference too, and the inexpensive cardboard used varies in color at times. It can also be coated/uncoated stock absorbing the ink differently.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2013, 04:38 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,979
Default Paint Balls

More good info , thanks Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-16-2013, 07:08 PM
Harliduck's Avatar
Harliduck Harliduck is offline
John Otto
J0hn Ot.to
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Marysville, Wa
Posts: 1,685
Default

When I was putting my 66 set together, I thought I may have stumbled into some reprints, but was wondering why would certain commons be reprinted. Some of the cards seem thinner, and are much whiter. I did a search here when I first joined and noticed this topic on 66s comes up about once a year, so I felt much better that in the very least I wasn't alone...
__________________
John Otto

1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete
1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete
1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1966 Topps lot of 108 different vintagetoppsguy 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 4 02-22-2013 05:44 PM
Trade- 1966 & 69 Topps for 1970 Topps Harliduck 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 12-07-2012 01:19 AM
F/T: 1966 Topps (Yaz) SmokyBurgess 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 04-07-2011 07:30 AM
F/T: 1966 Topps Maz SmokyBurgess 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 12-08-2010 07:49 AM
For Sale- Mickey Mantle cards 1957 Topps, 1960 Topps, 1963 Topps, and 1966 Topps Archive 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 5 02-01-2009 12:51 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.


ebay GSB