 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-26-2019, 07:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Question on '83 Topps graded Sandberg
Hi all. Just looking for opinions here. I have this Beckett graded Sandberg which comes in at a "9." If you look at the sub grades, the card is gem mint 9.5 on corners, centering, and edges. Pretty spectacular card. The card received an 8.5 for surface which knocked it down to a 9. It's tough to tell here in the pic, but the front surface looks immaculate to me. The only issue I can see is on the reverse, just under the M in Montreal at the bottom, there is a small factory blot of some sort. My question is this: would this card command a premium because of the gem mint subgrades (3 out of 4), or am I just stuck with a "normal" 9 value here.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1983 Topps Ryne Sandberg RC PSA 10. 10% below VCP. | phabphour20 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 02-27-2015 01:10 PM |
| WTB 1983 Topps PSA 9 - Boggs, Gwynn, and Sandberg | 25801wv | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 10-11-2013 09:30 PM |
| 1983 Topps Ryne Sandberg PSA 8 FT | HOF Yankees | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-16-2013 10:19 PM |
| 1983 Topps Ryne Sandberg, PSA 8 FS | Beatles Guy | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 09-19-2012 09:18 PM |
| FS-2 Sandberg Auto Topps RCs | al032184 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 08-02-2010 06:40 PM |
Threaded Mode