NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used > Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2012, 02:44 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default Sellers who guarantee an item to pass but won't refund authentication fees

This bothers me. If you put in your listing that you guarantee the item to pass authentication, why wouldn't you also agree to refund the authentication fees if it fails? I'm not understanding the logic. I want to buy a high dollar item that is not yet authenticated. Seller guarantees the item to pass. But will not agree to refund the authentication fee if it fails.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 02:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2012, 02:49 PM
Sean1125 Sean1125 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,566
Default

Personally, I only guarantee autographs I've had someone who is experienced with the player or a long time hobby member (or 2... or 3) say is good.

I would not refund authentication fees but would refund the item+ shipping.

It is your risk, there are 100% good items denied by both PSA and JSA, I know Jeter is one of the big ones.


My thoughts,

Sean
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:31 PM
Lordstan's Avatar
Lordstan Lordstan is online now
M@rk V3l@rd3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,754
Default

From a functional standpoint, what a seller is really offering in this instance, is a money back guarantee based on authenticity. They use the wording "guaranteed to pass PSA/JSA" because currently they are the most popular choices for authentication.

Ultimately, the choice to send it to PSA or JSA is the buyers not the sellers. Why should the seller pay for the opinion itself, when he/she didn't ask for it? The buyer is likely doing it because they either want to feel more comfortable or they want to resell the item. Neither is the responsibility of the seller, as they have already offered a money back guarantee.

Additionally, for an average seller, not someone who is a known dealer like Jim Stinson, Richard Simon, or Kevin Keating, the price you will likely pay for an uncerted item is less. If the seller got the cert beforehand the price would've been higher to offset the cost of the cert.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress).
https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy

Other interests/sets/collectibles.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums

My for sale or trade photobucket album
https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:32 PM
travrosty travrosty is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,223
Default

before you bid, ask if they will refund authentication fee, if they wont, then bid or dont bid accordingly. but why anyone would play the authentication game and guarantee that the guessers will pass anything or not is beyond me.


we have seen time and time again they will pass what they want and fail what they want.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:57 PM
Paulanthony's Avatar
Paulanthony Paulanthony is offline
Paulanthony
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 58
Default

This is a loaded question Due to high error rates by PSA/DNA, JSA and GAI, their opinions don't include to prove or serve to prove the authenticity. In other words the opinion of the examiner is a belief which may be considered a strong impression and less stronger than positive knowledge. If this wasn't true all certificates of authenticity would read, unconditionaly guaranteed authentic or your money back. Most of the time they get it right. I like autographs and I would have no problem with the services of Richard Simon or JSA. Here is my experience with JSA and why they might make mistakes. I attended a card show and submitted a baseball to Spence. The ball had eighteen signatures, Babe Ruth, Lefty Gomez was my big concern. I paid him $200.00 up front. I came back One Hour and twenty minutes. The ball was done and they said it was good. Does any one think that ball went through a vigorous examination. How long should it take a professional person or persons to authenticate eighteen faded signatures. I believe much longer then JSA did.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2012, 04:35 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I understand what you guys are saying but I think we're talking about different things. If you put in your description that the item is guaranteed to pass authentication, then why wouldn't you also guarantee the authentication fee? What exactly are you saying when you say the item will pass authentication but you aren't going to be liable for the authentication fee should it fail?

Otherwise don't offer the guarantee.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2012, 05:01 PM
Sean1125 Sean1125 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
I understand what you guys are saying but I think we're talking about different things. If you put in your description that the item is guaranteed to pass authentication, then why wouldn't you also guarantee the authentication fee? What exactly are you saying when you say the item will pass authentication but you aren't going to be liable for the authentication fee should it fail?

Otherwise don't offer the guarantee.
Being objective, my items that are sold without authentication typically sell for 1/4-1/2 of the item authenticated, if I cared to pay PSA for their opinion I would - but I don't, so I don't.

In most cases I would say you are getting the item cheaper than if it came authenticated, and still cheaper than an authenticated one (if) it does pass.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:18 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

In almost every case you will get an unauthenticated item cheaper than you would an authenticated item. I will only buy an unauthenticated item if I belive it to be good. And I will take the chance should it fail.

However, if a seller is going to guarantee an item will pass, I don't understand why they wouldn't guarantee the fee. You are offering a guarantee on the authenticity and saying you guarantee it to pass. Why then would a buyer have to be the one going out on a limb on the fee if you're the one who guarantees it will pass?

To be clear, I'm not talking about offering a refund if an item fails. I'm talking about a seller explicitly using the words "guaranteed to pass authentication."

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 06:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:23 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

I bet dealers will consent to refund your authentication fees if it fails if you guarantee to give them the 30% bump in price if it passes!

No dealer in the World I know of (in any area of collectibles, not just cards/autographs) will give you fees back based on a choice of who you want to look at the item after you buy it, and they shouldn't. A guarantee of the item itself and purchase price is all that should be expected of a dealer. I have been dealing in autographs for a LONG time, sold literally thousands of signatures and do not refund authentication fees and never will. Mostly because I believe I know more than they do to begin with, but it is just a bad business practice to guarantee the quality of your item on the opinion of anothers and refund the "other guy" for his opinion about your piece.

Third party authentication is a choice, not a right. Maybe some dealers do that, but I cant think of a single one in my time in the hobby.

Rhys
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:26 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I'm sorry but I think we're still talking about different things. I'm not talking about a seller's guarantee on authenticity. I'm talking about putting the following line directly into the text of your auction:

Guaranteed to pass authentication.

What does that mean if you are not willing to refund the fee as well? Again, I'm not talking about a guaranteed refund if the item fails. I'm talking about a seller choosing to say they guarantee it will pass authentication.

That is the sellers choice of words NOT the buyers.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 06:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:36 PM
earlywynnfan's Avatar
earlywynnfan earlywynnfan is offline
Ke.n Su.lik
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,230
Default

I have the term in my ebay items, and in no way feel I should be on the hook for authentication fees. Couldn't a buyer then want me to pay for the authentication fees if it passes?

If I put in "displays beautifully," do I need to provide for the display case? After all, a nice case would definitely make it display beautifully!

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:37 PM
chaddurbin's Avatar
chaddurbin chaddurbin is offline
qu@n nguy3n
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,688
Default

is this about abbeychimay? i take "guaranteed to pass authentication" as meaning "the signature is real". i don't see why he has to refund the tpg fees. if he was to do that he might as well send his ruth/cobb/johnson etc in himself and get the premiums from those certs.
__________________
One post max per thread.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:44 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I guess I am alone on this point. That's okay. I just think saying you will offer a refund if the item fails is much different from a guarantee that it will pass authentication.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 06:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:46 PM
chaddurbin's Avatar
chaddurbin chaddurbin is offline
qu@n nguy3n
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,688
Default

i would use "guaranteed to pass...", it's common language. better than "i promise this signature is authentic but if psa or jsa says it's not i will send you your money back".
__________________
One post max per thread.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:54 PM
MooseDog's Avatar
MooseDog MooseDog is offline
J Stone
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,180
Default

FWIW this is the wording I use in my autograph listings.

"All autographs are sold with a 100% guarantee of authenticity, for life (yours, mine or the autograph). If any autograph we sell fails to pass authentication by reputable 3rd party authenticators we will be happy to refund your purchase price."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-27-2012, 07:08 PM
JimStinson's Avatar
JimStinson JimStinson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,509
Default JimStinson

When Joe Namath said We're going to win Sunday. I guarantee it. what would have happened if the Jets had lost ?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-27-2012, 07:26 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

They would have lost and his guarantee would have meant nothing, which is exactly my point.

Maybe I'm just being thick or getting caught up in semantics. I'm sorry if I'm being obtuse. I would just like a seller to be clear. Full refund on purchase price should it fail authentication is clear. Guaranteed to pass authentication says nothing about who the fees should fall on if that guarantee is not met.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 07:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-27-2012, 07:42 PM
JimStinson's Avatar
JimStinson JimStinson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,509
Default JimStinson

But the Jets Won ! Actually this is my favorite Joe Namath quote

"When we won the league championship, all the married guys on the club had to thank their wives for putting up with all the stress and strain all season. I had to thank all the single broads in New York"
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-27-2012, 07:46 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I would buy a win from Joe Namath.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-27-2012, 07:52 PM
thenavarro thenavarro is offline
Mike Navarro
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 975
Default

I routinely give a guarantee on most items that I sell that they will pass PSA/DNA or JSA, or I will refund both the purchase price AND the authentication fees. I say "most" items because there are some names that I've found them to be bad with including but not exclusive to be Pujols, Manning, and Woods. On those names, I will offer a money back guarantee on the purchase price only. I'm not afraid of their opinion or of their skill (or lack thereof on occasion), and if I'm selling an item, I will have done my own homework to ascertain what I believe the probability of them passing the item to be before I offer the guarantee to pay the authentication fees if it were to fail.

I've had one item returned due to failing JSA and I promptly made good on my guarantee to refund the authentication fees as well. It was a Muhammad Ali autographed glove, Unlike most here that say they don't get an explanation, I asked Jimmy why it failed and they spent some time with me showing me some exemplars and explaining why in his opinion my Ali was not real. Then again, I don't make an issue out of their errors, nor do I routinely slam them on the Internet, nor do I ask countless rhetorical questions to rub their nose in their errors, so my experience with them might be different then the experience of those that do those things.

As with other things in life, your mileage may vary.

Mike

Last edited by thenavarro; 08-27-2012 at 09:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:01 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I would buy from you any day.

The point I'm trying to make is that I would feel better about buying an unauthenticated item from someone who says they guarantee the item to pass authentication than I would buying from someone who says they'll offer a refund on the purchase price if it fails. To me, a guarantee the item will pass authentication says something different than I will refund your purchase price IF it fails.

However, it seems like the two phrases mean the same thing to most people when they mean different things to me.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:21 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,042
Default

As long as the rule of the refund is disclosed up front there is nothing to whine about. If the buyer wants to play the TPG game he can, if not he can just keep the item as is.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:42 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

A seller isn't under any obligation to guarantee any outcome of a third party grader's inspection. If you do, then that has nothing to do with the buyer deciding to play the TPG game.

Buyers are free to play the gamble game on auctions that state a refund of the purchase price will be given if the item fails authenticaton. But a guarantee isn't a gamble or an if. And if you are going to guarantee something, then I don't see what the issue is with putting your money where your mouth is.

Last edited by packs; 08-27-2012 at 08:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:09 PM
drc drc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,621
Default

Not strictly talking about autographs, but when I was selling it I allowed the buyer to return it within specified reasonable amount of time for refund, with no questions asked. The buyer had time to look it over, show it to a friend or whatever. If he didn't return it (any reason allowed), he didn't return it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:17 PM
travrosty travrosty is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
I'm sorry but I think we're still talking about different things. I'm not talking about a seller's guarantee on authenticity. I'm talking about putting the following line directly into the text of your auction:

Guaranteed to pass authentication.

What does that mean if you are not willing to refund the fee as well? Again, I'm not talking about a guaranteed refund if the item fails. I'm talking about a seller choosing to say they guarantee it will pass authentication.

That is the sellers choice of words NOT the buyers.



because the authentication could cost 1000 dollars. who's to control the costs of the authentication, guaranteeing authentication fees is crazy.


plus if it is a real item and you DO put your money where your mouth is and guarantee authentication fees, and the jack wagons at abc and xyz dont know what they are doing, why should you refund authentication fees on a bad authentication?

Last edited by travrosty; 08-27-2012 at 10:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:20 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

I understand what you are saying but here is the difference in my opinion

Scenario 1. "I guarantee this item to be authentic". It fails, you go to get your money back and you have to get into the whole "Woo are they to say my autograph is not real etc." and then you have to get into the whole "I say its real, they say its not, you cant prove anything" situation of he said she said.

Scenario 2. "I Guarantee this item to be authentic and to pass any third party grader you choose, PSA, JSA whatever". It fails, refund end of story!

I think that is why you put that in an auction description, peace of mind knowing that you will stand behind the item based on the opinion of another person. It is the same guarantee (at least from well respected dealers) but some people might be left arguing over the grey area in Scenario 1.

Rhys
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:25 PM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,547
Default

As a side note, I always have and always will refund Baseball Card Grading fees if a card is fake or timmed, so I see your point, but there its like $10 and it is a good will gesture more than anything. Some autograph authentications can run more than the item is worth. I see people with slabbed encapsulated Monte Irvin Index Cards all the time. If I sell a Monte Irvin for $5 and some guy overnights it to PSA to get it slabbed for a show or something and it fails, he is out 10X more than he paid for the signature and I would end up owing him back $55 on his $5 purchase (and it might not be fake anyways). With cards at least if it is deemed "counterfeit" or recolored or rebacked there is concrete evidence to show it and in that case, yes I think it would ethical.

As another sidenote, if an autograph seller is forging signatures than I think part of the restitution would be to refund any and all authentication fees but that is a different can of worms (IE: Coaches Corner).

Rhys
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:01 PM
thecatspajamas's Avatar
thecatspajamas thecatspajamas is offline
L@nce Fit.tro
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 2,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
A seller isn't under any obligation to guarantee any outcome of a third party grader's inspection. If you do, then that has nothing to do with the buyer deciding to play the TPG game.

Buyers are free to play the gamble game on auctions that state a refund of the purchase price will be given if the item fails authenticaton. But a guarantee isn't a gamble or an if. And if you are going to guarantee something, then I don't see what the issue is with putting your money where your mouth is.
You said it earlier in that it's a matter of semantics, and more importantly, unstated assumptions as to the extent of the "guarantee." If the seller is okay with being on the hook for whatever authentication you choose to submit the item to, and tells you that he is okay with that, then obviously that's a favorable situation for you as the buyer. Plenty have given reasons here why it doesn't make business sense for the seller to subject themselves to that hook, but if the seller wants to knowingly leave themselves open to whatever authentication fees you may choose to throw on top of the deal, that's their right.

More important though is that you get those semantic gray areas cleared up BEFORE completing the transaction. Too often deals go bad because someone made an incorrect assumption and then wants to hold the other party to that assumption. If you don't ask for clarification, you don't have any right to hold a seller to anything more than was stated in their listing, and if you're working from a different definition of the extent of "guaranteed to pass xyz" than most sellers (and you are, judging by the previous posts), you owe it to them as a responsible buyer to clear that up beforehand. It's fine if you want to argue semantics, but do so before money has changed hands.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:10 PM
drc drc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,621
Default

One reason a seller wouldn't blindly guarantee to refund 'authentication fees' is he has no idea what (if any) authentication the buyer will have the autograph go through. For all the seller knows, a buyer could send a Bob Feller ball to JSA then PSA then Richard Simon then Chris Morales then PSA a second time and 5 monthrs later the seller could end up with a $500 authentication fee refund on a $17 ball.

Last edited by drc; 08-27-2012 at 11:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-27-2012, 11:36 PM
Sean1125 Sean1125 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,566
Default

I'm guaranteeing the item with my research and the opinions of others. I know the item is good, even if TPG thinks it's bad - I truly believe the item is real.

So I am willing to protect your purchase price on the item plus shipping + shipping back.

It was your decision to send it to a TPG, if that hologram before putting iton a wall meant $50 to you, but they said no - you can still put it on a wall it knowing at any time (in the somewhat near future) you could return it for a full refund.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 08-28-2012, 12:23 AM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,317
Default

I'm not disagreeing with you guys. I think it's fine if a seller will refund only the purchase price if an item fails. I have no problem with that. But we're not talking about the same thing. Sometimes I feel like I know what I mean but I have trouble expressing it. I'm letting it go. We're all in agreement that a seller doesn't have an obligation to cover fees because they sold an unauthenticated item that failed. I'm with you on that.

Last edited by packs; 08-28-2012 at 12:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:16 PM
shelly shelly is offline
Shelly Jaf.fe
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,248
Default

Most of the time there praying you don not send it to a tpa because he knows it is bad. If come back big deal only cost him freight.
I have never seen anyone that says if it is bad I will refund the fee for having it looked at. If he thought it was authentic then he would get it done and make more money selling it. All he is saying it will pass tpa's
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perhaps the most unusual Joe Jackson item Shoeless Moe Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 11-17-2010 07:42 PM
I was thinking. and its baffling. GrayGhost Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 22 06-25-2009 03:23 PM
Mr. Verkman – Keep your Word - Letters From Bill Mastro, Joe Orlando, & Marshall Fogel Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 125 03-23-2007 02:02 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 AM.


ebay GSB