Do you believe there are any undervalued Mantle items?

[KCRfan1]

Getting away from the 1952 Topps and 1951 Bowman due to their price and ability for most to acquire one, are there any Mantle cards that could be viewed as " undervalued "? Undervalued can take many shapes and forms. Such as: Is the card difficult to find in good condition, centering, price in relationship to the year of the card and Mantles career. Perhaps the popularity of the year of the set, which may impact the value of a Mantle card for better or worse.

What are your thoughts? I really don't know. I remember a board member posting years ago that the only people who thought Mantle was too expensive were the ones who did not own a Mantle.

So my question is: Do you believe there are any undervalued Mantle cards?

[PolarBear]

No.


But, I will say the 51 Bowman is grossly undervalued compared to the 52 Topps. 5k for a 51 PSA 4 or 30k for a 52 PSA 4. I just don't get it.

The 51 looks 10x better than the 52 and it's his true rookie. Heck, I'd rather have his 52 Bowman than a 52 Topps.

Same argument goes for his 53 Bowman vs his 53 Topps.

[KCRfan1]

That 1953 Bowman is one of the best looking Mantle cards I have ever seen. The fact that the card is part of a set that is wildly popular adds to the appeal.

[Bestdj777]

Yes. There are a number of undervalued Mantles.

[sflayank]

YES
mantle dice game
mantle discs
mantle mask
mantle punchouts
1967 mantle stand up NICEST CARD EVER MADE
everyone of these is 100x rarer than a 52 topps

[ALR-bishop]

Adding to Larry's list

67 Disc
68 Disc

Of course you have to find one, and even if Larry is right about them being undervalued, they won't be cheap