|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I don't collect the early 50's, but when it comes to the 60's and 70's sets, your rankings are spot on. 1961, 1962, 1966 and 1967 are beyond the pale tough to find at 'reasonable' prices in nice shape. So many of mine need to be upgraded, but I ain't holding my breath.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice. Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Degree of difficulty...T207 backs | Vintagecatcher | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-30-2015 09:30 PM |
Have fun on ESPN Classic - Ranking all time Best World Series Teams | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-05-2006 12:44 PM |
Ranking the difficulty of nineteenth century issues ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-24-2005 07:29 PM |
Ranking the difficulty of 20th Century Prewar sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-24-2005 07:20 PM |
Degree of Difficulty: American Beauty Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-12-2002 08:50 PM |