|
|
View Poll Results: Does putting invisible ink on a card devalue it? | |||
Yes it devalues the card and should been disclosed in the sale. | 55 | 76.39% | |
No it doesn't devalue the card. Out of sight, out of mind. | 8 | 11.11% | |
Don't have a clue. | 9 | 12.50% | |
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another vote for misrepresented
Edited to add: It wouldn't bother me, but I can understand why it would bother others. So, yes, I feel it was misrepresented, but I voted, "No it doesn't devalue the card." Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 08-10-2011 at 04:57 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
+1, I also think it should have been disclosed, but doesn't devalue the card.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Regards, Larry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Whether you can see it or not, it's still there. Why in the world would the seller put the ink on the card?
Have to go with the misrepresented like everyone else. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
The KGB will never grade it higher than Authentic.
__________________
Looking for 1909 Obak upgrades, provided you don't mind me paying with torn and waterlogged 1971 series $20 bills... http://imageevent.com/boboinnes/obaks |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Just curious do you usually subject your cards to the rigorous "black light" torture test?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Very rarely, but in this case I did when the seller later acknowledged he did this.
Last edited by WhenItWasAHobby; 08-10-2011 at 08:25 PM. Reason: grammar |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting thread.
What card was it? What did the seller put it on it and why did he tell you he did it?
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
It was a post-war Topps common card. The seller, I'll call "Mr. X" claimed to have put invisible ink on the edges of all four sides to see if the buyer, "Mr. Y" would trim it and re-sell it in graded form. As it turns out, the card was graded by a Third Party Grading company and put up for sale by Mr. Y, and Mr. X asked his friend, "Mr. Z" to buy the card from Mr. Y. When the card got back to Mr. X, he "determined" that the card was indeed trimmed since no invisible ink could be detected on the bottom edge. As a result, Mr. X went on a covert smear campaign inferring that Mr Y and the TPG company president needed to go to jail and the TPG needed be put out of business.
Last edited by WhenItWasAHobby; 11-25-2011 at 10:43 PM. Reason: grammar |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
FS: T200 Fatima Pirates Team Card incl Honus Wagner Likely Trimmed But Very Nice $200 | packs | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 10-14-2009 02:43 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |
POLL: Trimmed Card Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 12-22-2005 09:06 AM |