![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Shop Ebay Promotions Vintage Memorabilia Pre WWII-(Pre 1942) Baseball Post WWII (1942-1980) Baseball Modern (1980-present) Baseball |
#1081
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas---can not remember if it was here or somewhere else that is was pointed out that this card has a recurring red dot defect on the back in the number. My red dot version seems to have more spacing on the front. Do you know if those differences coincide ?
![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 05-19-2018 at 11:55 AM. |
#1082
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'd say we should try for a common set of terms, but I know that getting even common agreement among collectors would be almost impossible. |
#1083
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But the bottom of "ies" in series is different, so still a different card. |
#1084
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With the 1964 #102 Checklist, the easiest way to immediately see the different versions is to look at the player's mitt near his wrist. As you can see in Sliphorn's pics, one has a fully brown mitt and the other has a strip of the brown missing there. There seems to be an equal number of each version out there, so it definitely fits in with the 'printed in different series' scenario...or they were possibly both printed at the same time on the same sheet in the same series.
__________________
Check out my bucket(s). Virtually everything is available for trade: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 http://s1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee404/JollyElm/ http://s1036.photobucket.com/user/elmjack44/library/ “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel |
#1085
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good eyes picking up the mitt colors. That is what I like with the group being able to spot things I missed. I also see these as being orange and not red. Am I color blind?
|
#1086
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How is "its" different? I am not seeing it. I assume you mean on the back with the World Series highlights? Thanks.
|
#1087
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll check on the coincidence. I went to COMC and it appeared that they do NOT have specific issues. Good question.
|
#1088
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My card with the red dot in the number on the back has the missing brown in the mitt on the front pointed out by Darren, and the defective IES in Series on the front pointed out by Steve, and the brighter orange border on the back pointed out by Thomas. Are these differences always consistent such there are just 2 versions ?
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 05-20-2018 at 03:09 PM. |
#1089
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love the unique proof variations ... cards printed prior to production and never made it further. Some are very obvious (like the 1977 Reggie), others not so much.
|
#1090
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
trying to list a few Cubs cards ....
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 08:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 01:52 PM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 06:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 09:58 PM |