 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-15-2016, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1956 Topps sp's?
Without looking to see if this is a duplicate thread, I wanted to discuss the inclusion in older price guides of selected players cards as premiums without a specific reason.
In 1956: #268 a common player, #280 Gilliam, and #288 Cerv. Ok Gilliam maybe, but the other 2 guys? Someone long ago labeled these as tough and it's stuck. Now I'm not convinced that ebay buyers have followed suit in terms of a premium purchase price, but where's the support for the increase in value. In 1962, #570 and #572 same thing We all know the 66 and 67 high number stories so common players get a pass on this discussion in those years. Also, as long as I'm on a roll, does anyone think that the last 8 cards of the 62 set (Rookie cards) were a separate printing from the rest? Comments welcome. BillP 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1966 Topps #50 Mickey Mantle PSA 7, 1956 Topps #113 Phil Rizzuto PSA 6 | jb217676 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 3 | 11-22-2015 10:35 AM |
| FS: 1954 Topps Snider SGC 88 and 1956 Topps Aaron BVG 8 - Prices Lowered | Baseball*Collectibles | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-15-2015 05:00 PM |
| 1956 Topps #176 Alex Kellner PSA 9, Other 1956 Topps PSA 8 and 9 on eBay | larrysg01 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2010 09:28 AM |
| 1956 Topps #111 Red Sox Team PSA 8, Other 1956 Topps PSA 8 and 9 on eBay | larrysg01 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2009 04:32 AM |
| 1956 Topps #15 Ernie Banks PSA 8, Other 1956 Topps PSA 8 and 9 on eBay | larrysg01 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-14-2009 04:36 AM |
Linear Mode
