|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to spot a fake 1963 Pete Rose?
Every website says the fakes are on lighter card stock, enabling light to show through.
Can someone test whether or not an iPhone light can shine through an authentic Rose RC? I just bought one that I was told was authentic, but my iPhone light does get through. Thanks! I’ll try to post pics later. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Your best bet is to use a magnifier and compare it to another 1963 card. Sometimes using a phone camera on zoom will work.
But the real question is how much did you pay for it? Where did you get it? If it was online do you have a link? For 30+ years the Rose rc is one of the most faked. Your best bet is to buy it graded. If you saved a lot of money by buying one raw you probably got what you paid for. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Please tell me what you think? I do know its trimmed. I just want to make sure it's authentic. Last edited by eliotdeutsch; 04-22-2019 at 05:35 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1963 Rose
Hello, Looks like a real one to me but does looked trimmed along at least a couple edges. The off-center nature illustrated on your card is typically not found on reprints and the color and card stock type on the back look authentic. I'm just a collector and not an expert but I would've bid on this one as it looks like others I own.
Last edited by fusorcruiser; 04-22-2019 at 07:04 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Something doesn't look quite right to me
As was previously suggested - get it under good magnification - If under magnification you see a pattern of dots - it is no good. If it is solid (no dots) under magnification it is good.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The top of the card looks trimmed to me. As stated earlier the centering indicates that it is probably not a fake. One thing that concerns me as well is the how nice the top corners are compared to the bottom. Maybe the trim job has something to do with that.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The pictures however should have dots. The rest should not. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Your card is real. It's not complicated....the cap of a fake Rose rookie has a thin black outline on it. Here's counterfeit card to compare with your Rose rookie...….. . TED Z T206 Reference . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Rose
should one be proud to own a collection of "original reprints " ?..
Imagine the prestige associated with having counterfeit baseball cards that have been stamped on the back .assuring you - that,yes they are original...reprints |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I have to figure an original reprint is more valuable than a reprinted reprint.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1963 Pete Rose | felada | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 04-19-2016 08:45 PM |
1963 Pete Rose RC SGC 84/7 | ezez420 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-24-2015 08:32 AM |
1963 Pete Rose RC SGC 84/7 | ezez420 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2015 03:12 PM |
How do you tell if a 1963 Topps Pete Rose is a Fake? | vintagehofrookies | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 07-21-2011 09:52 PM |
FS: 1963 Pete Rose SGC 50 | t206 cubs | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-27-2010 05:00 PM |