|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SGC has weighted this set as part of their set composition. I believe their weighting to be very accurate.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for doing this, Brian - I am at 55
__________________
T201 (50/50) T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (118/121) E90-3 (20/20) E91A/B/C (96/99) E93 (17/30) E95/96 (26/55) C59-61 (149/248) N28/N29 A&G (84/100) 1901-02 Ogden Tabs (1,327/1,560) 1933-41 Goudey (265/478) 1939-41 Play Ball (381/473) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, K4, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225, W512, W513, W542, W552, W565, Dozens of smaller uncategorized sets Founder: www.prewarcards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'm at 91, as I have all the HOFers except Young (Cleveland), and Buck Jordan.
Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce. Current Wantlist: 1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back) 1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
My brain is made of pun putty
Thanks for the participation and suggestions so far.
I am still at the slight adjustment and Tinker phase (Joe will be remain at the 1 point status, no Chance for him to Evers elevate up to the 3 point level). I am willing to shorten the Plank from 4 to 3 points in length. As a result, I would like to elicit suggestions on which card that is currently 3 points that would be the best candidate to be elevated to 4 points. Also, I would be willing to drop the Stone down to the 1 point depth. What would your best candidate be to elevate from 1 point to 3 points? After your input on these potential slight adjustments I will set the point system into cement. Brian |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks, Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Brian, I guess you could say it's just another input to use. I'm not saying it's perfect, but I have had some input in making minor adjustments to it over the years.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I’d keep Stone up there and add Bemis, clement, o’connor, Seigle, Howell (wind-up) for 3 points each.
Sweeney to 5 Lower Plank to 3 points and Jackson to 20. Total max of 260. Just my perspective. Either way, fun set. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Outsider looking in, been there done it. I would lower the Cobb, it's not tough and raise the Stahl and Walsh a level.
Hope the thread generates more interest in the set. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for organizing. Put me down for a whopping 36
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Century
Pending any scoring changes, the re-ranking of Overall puts me at an even 100.
I like the weighting here more than SGC, although some are equivalent. SGC weighs all HOFer at 3, and we know that Wallace, Bender, Bresnahan and Crawford are easily found...and not as key to set completion as some of the toughies weighted above. Surely there are more e90-1 collectors out there?
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MONSTER Bobby Orr Collection For SALE! | jb217676 | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 7 | 08-09-2017 07:59 AM |
Do you like to post your autographs collection online? | homerunhitter | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 07-03-2017 11:22 AM |
Post the Pride of your Post War Collection | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 27 | 09-04-2008 08:54 PM |
Post your entire collection! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 05-26-2008 04:07 PM |
Post Your Nagy Collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-12-2007 02:34 PM |