 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-11-2013, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Here we go again.....
__________________
John Hat.cher 
|
|
#2
09-11-2013, 07:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
How many times and by how many experts do these idiots have to be told the card is a $1 fake? I just don't get it. I never did, never will. Complete idiots.
__________________
T206 518/518
|
|
#3
09-11-2013, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not sure what's more pathetic these guys trying to sell this thing over and over or O'Keefe giving it print time yet again, must be a slow day at the Daily News.
|
|
#4
09-11-2013, 08:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What I did not understand about the O'Keefe article was his balanced approach, as if there are two camps of thought on the card. I guess there are the 2 owners vs. everyone else.
|
|
#5
09-11-2013, 09:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Counterpoint
It's not just that some/many think the card is a reprinted front pasted to the authentic back of a T206, it's that objectively, that is reality. If there were only one person in the world who knew the front of the card was a fake and everyone else believed it to be real, it still wouldn't make it so. Michael O'Keeffe chooses, again, to ignore that reality.
I was there when Cobb and Edwards purchased the card at a sportscard convention in Cincinnati--from a dealer with a table full of reprints and broders--and they (Cobb & Edwards) both knew and were told from the very beginning that it was a fake. The story was pathetic when it was first presented by O'Keeffe in his book and is perhaps even more pathetic now. Last edited by MW1; 09-12-2013 at 01:39 AM. Reason: edited for grammar
|
|
#6
09-12-2013, 11:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
They were even told is was reprint on television ...
http://sportscardinfo.wordpress.com/...s-t206-wagner/
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
