Partial red designation ???? On t206

[Archive]

Posted By: ScottIngold

Does anyone know what this means ? I know the obvious. But where is the red missing from ?

[Archive]

Posted By: Martin Neal

Maybe they meant partial team designation. By the way that is a awful nice card for VG

[Archive]

Posted By: warshawlaw

Isn't there supposed to be a "B" on there?

[Archive]

Posted By: Bobby

red is in all the right places just looks faded or bleached.

[Archive]

Posted By: Frank Wakefield

I agree, all of the red seems there. At first I thought it was missing a "B" on the cap. But I dug out my Stahl, and they look the same.

I'm getting crosseyed looking at all of the backs, filling out that spreadsheet for that super set survey... Hard on old eyes...

So I think that part of the red is on that Stahl, along with the rest of the red, too! The grader most likely knew (and knows) less about these little white border cards than we do.

Frank.

[Archive]

Posted By: ScottIngold

So it's not just me than ? No "B" is correct. And all else is right.

Yes i think GAI is very tough on T206'S . But note the small paper loss under the name.

[Archive]

Posted By: Bob Pomilla

Read it wrong. Time for stronger glasses.

[Archive]

Posted By: Bobby

I just think it is faded or bleached here is a link to mine:

http://www.vintagecardprices.com/card_profile.php?card_id=34106

much more vibrant in the red department.

[Archive]

Posted By: Brian Weisner

I think it's a screw up..... I have sveral No B, or No Red Boston cards, but none like Stahl, which is normal. I will be happy to post or email "real" partial red's to you, but this isn't one of them.

Be well Brian

PS This card is normal, no more or less red than the average card, in fact this is probably a perfect example of the average T206 card.

[Archive]

Posted By: Brian Weisner

[Archive]

Posted By: Steve M.

red missing.

[Archive]

Posted By: fkw

Thats Stahl slab ID is a screw up to me.

here is another "Partial Red"