|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I obviously missed that in my searching. Thanks for tipping me off about the other examples. Does anyone know why/how the partial border Campos became a desired error, and the Snider/Scheib/Woodling/whoever is looked at as more or less an oddity?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Personal opinion - because the Campos also has a popular rare variant with the star on back. When something crops up on a card already hobby known for a variation, it gets more traction then when it's on a 'normal' card. The Campos is also more pronounced; it's missing the black in a larger area then the small indents in frames on other cards in the set.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There are quite a few variations associated with the Campos variation. Campos occured near the end of the production run. It appears as if Topps was in a hurry, damaged the masking. It is one of the more noticeable variations that happens to coincide with the red star black star variation. Both are difficult are considered scarce and gnerally most set collector's don't consider the set complete without these variations. Here is a link to the variations thread.
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=333532 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I am an ungraded collector but if you had both Sniders , or all 3/4 Campos or 2/3 of the 58 Herrera, or both of the 57 Bakers, and the cards were all identical in condition, should defects like these affect the grade ? And if the variation(s) has not been formally recognized in the hobby like the majority of those in the never ending Variants thread would that matter ? Or do manufacturer defects ever affect grading, and if so when/why ?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Limited manufacturing defects affect grading like a miscut/centering. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Two ex or better 1952 topps I had graded recently came back psa 3s. My guess , they would have been psa 5pd, but now they say psa 3
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Now with print defect they label as an variation I have got it graded like a normal card, got the (PD) for the error on the card, and then finally labeled correctly. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS - 1952 Topps Duke Snider PSA 7 | ccre | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-19-2023 08:33 AM |
F/S 1952 Topps Duke Snider SGC 7 centered | Raremintpaper | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-13-2022 09:32 AM |
F/S: 1952 Topps Duke Snider SGC 3 | bks14sr | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-02-2020 06:04 AM |
1952 Topps Lot of 12 (SOLD) Duke Snider | Head928 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-22-2016 12:13 PM |
FS: 1952 Topps Duke Snider #37 SGC 60 - $105 dlvd | x2drich2000 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-16-2015 09:45 AM |