|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
For anybody still tuning in...
I received the card today and it is exactly as described. Just a small amount of gum/wax residue in front of the Mick's (get ready for a ten dollar word) philtrum. I messed around with the contrast and what not in photoshop to really make it plainly visible. 1968mantle280a.jpg1968mantle280b.jpg This coulda/shoulda/woulda been removed quite easily before the TPG got their hands on it. Too bad. Perhaps PSA should create a new qualifier (WX or GM) to denote these type of harmless anomalies. Calling them stains is just plain wrong. A stain (on front anyway) is the result of someone spilling their coffee on a card, NOT having easily wiped away gum residue there. Two completely different things. Somebody get Joe Orlando on the phone!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC and wax stains | bnorth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 09-22-2016 06:51 PM |
51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 10:06 PM |
Well, the stains look authentic........ | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-04-2014 08:38 AM |
Wow! Stains added. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-12-2012 10:58 AM |
Gum Stains | almostdone | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-17-2011 08:25 PM |