NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2013, 07:59 AM
aloondilana aloondilana is offline
Jo.hn Per.ez
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 191
Default Inconsistancies with grading

Please take a look at the the three cards shown, my Ruth blows away both, yet it got the lowest grade. Do grading companies seem to give better grades to stiffs or lesser known stars?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RUTH.jpg (76.0 KB, 117 views)
File Type: jpg sgcinconsistancies1.jpg (70.3 KB, 116 views)
File Type: jpg sgc4.jpg (17.7 KB, 116 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:06 PM
novakjr novakjr is offline
David Nova.kovich Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 20 miles east of the Mistake
Posts: 2,269
Default

While the other two aren't necessarily impressive cards by any means, I think the grades look somewhat fair. The Ruth appears to have two bad surface spots.. I can't tell if it's paperloss, inkloss or just bad scrapes/scratches..

Still looks like a great card though..

Last edited by novakjr; 02-13-2013 at 01:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2013, 09:20 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,114
Default

Those scrapes or whatever they are are why the grade is low. It's a really great looking 35, and should bring more than a typical one.

The common that's a 50 seems like a really weak 50 to me. That happens sometimes. The scan of the 40 is just too small to really tell much.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2013, 10:35 PM
sdkammeyer's Avatar
sdkammeyer sdkammeyer is offline
Steve K@mmɘyɘr
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aloondilana View Post
Please take a look at the the three cards shown, my Ruth blows away both, yet it got the lowest grade. Do grading companies seem to give better grades to stiffs or lesser known stars?
Welcome to the site.

"Most" of us buy the card and not the grade. All in all, I believe TPG's do a good job and they serve their purpose. BUT, things slip through every now and then, and humans do make mistakes. In this era of internet buying/selling it is VERY difficult to get an idea of condition from just a couple scans or pictures.

Having a strong understanding of the grading system can help with confusion as well. It's not just a grade based on "initial eye appeal". A tiny crease or a tiny bit of paper loss will kill the grade even if the card looks spectacular (your Ruth is a good example).

http://www.sgccard.com/grading_scale.htm

Obviously your Ruth is offcenter, seems to have some scratches or paper loss, and we haven't seen the back either.

Last edited by sdkammeyer; 02-13-2013 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-18-2013, 08:04 PM
jjcollects's Avatar
jjcollects jjcollects is offline
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 471
Default grading

It is all a scam

Last edited by jjcollects; 02-18-2013 at 09:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-18-2013, 08:28 PM
RedlegsFan's Avatar
RedlegsFan RedlegsFan is offline
Wes
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 986
Default

Grading companies are businesses. They pay bills. That being said, they also influence the hobby and the card market. Obviously, the Ruth is better. (given the back is similar to the front). The Ruth probably belonged to some guy, who inherited it from his dad or grandfather, and wanted to sell it. Probably sent it in to SCG to give his card authenticity for a decent sale. SCG does not recognize this man's name, and probably knows what he's up to, and slaps a ridiculously low grade on it. The owner need not care, as he will fetch a pretty penny anyways, plus, he probably doesn't know any better.

Now, a dealer or company, on the other hand, probably spends a great portion of their revenue on sending old cards in to the grading companies. Obviously, when SGC or PSA has a 5 star client, they now can "pay the bills" and may not shy away from leaning towards higher grades, in general.... Problem with this, is that one grade higher or lower can mean the difference in somebody making a mortgage payment with that card, or losing their total investment.

You say, pay for the card, not the grade. That's only easy to do when you've already got 3 or 4 of that particular example. For the average Tom, Dick, or Harry collector, a $1,000 card means their chips are "all in" and can't afford any mulligans. Some would say to take your Ruth out, send it in again, or just leave it out. Either way, the grade disgraces the card. ( again, given the back is ok. )

So I guess what I'm saying is, I think if you take care of the grading companies, they will take care of you. Just my thoughts. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2013, 06:11 PM
novakjr novakjr is offline
David Nova.kovich Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 20 miles east of the Mistake
Posts: 2,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedlegsFan View Post
SCG does not recognize this man's name, and probably knows what he's up to, and slaps a ridiculously low grade on it.
Uhmmm! Did you look at the card? It has stains and paperloss/scrapes of some sort. I think the grade is fairly accurate...

The other two may be a hair strong. But the Ruth, while still VERY good looking despite it's flaws, got what it deserved..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2013, 09:15 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,114
Default

I can't say wether they take care of larger customers, but I can say that as a very small customer -average of one submission a year during a special and usually around 10 cards- my results have been very evenly split between ones I feel are right, over graded and under graded.

It really does come down to the individual graders, and maybe their mood that day. I know I have days where I look at cards and think they're all awful, and days where I like them better.

And I think that technically the Ruth is graded correctly.

Enjoy it, and don't worry so much about the grade. It's really nice for the grade, and if/when you sell it will do better than a typical 35.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KSA Grading bradmar48 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 08-15-2011 12:20 AM
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? brianp-beme Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 10-30-2010 09:11 AM
T3 grading Leon Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 10-06-2010 10:26 PM
SGS grading Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 10-22-2008 12:26 PM
GAI Grading Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 01-18-2003 09:50 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.


ebay GSB