NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post. Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2017, 01:22 PM
vintagetoppsguy's Avatar
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 4,748
Default Determining what is vintage

Ten years ago, if you asked us post-war collectors, "What is considered vintage?" most of us would probably agree anything produced before 1979.

Well, ten years later, do the parameters change? Do we expand it by 10 years and now consider 1989 Topps to be vintage? After all, 1989 Topps are now 29 years old. Yeah, yeah, I know that they were mass produced and there are still cases and cases sitting in warehouses. But do we let that (mass production) determine what is considered "vintage?"

When I started collecting in 1986, a card that was 29 years old (1957 Topps) would be considered vintage. So all these years later, why doesn't the same criteria apply to us collectors? In another 10 years, when the 1989 Topps are 39 years old, will they be considered vintage then?

I guess the point is, why do we allow production runs to determine what is vintage (because that's really what it boils down to if you think about it)? At what point will 1989 Topps (or fill in any other year) be considered vintage?

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2017, 01:40 PM
pawpawdiv9's Avatar
pawpawdiv9 pawpawdiv9 is offline
Chr!$ M!ll!c@n
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: GA
Posts: 2,057
Default

my opinon-
tobacco-ish cards = vintage
something like the goudeys and before = prewar
era 50's-70's = postwar
the donruss/late 80's-90-ish yrs = modern
new shiny stuff = ??? Y2K/test-tubers generation

**like how this N54 boards pretty sums it all up in each sections
__________________
MY COLLECTION 1magicschoolbus.imgur.com
BUY: HoF RC's & pre-war
WANT: PSA '33 RUTH GOUDEY (2-3 range)
NEED: (low-end) PSA 49 Bowman Satchel Paige
Successful Transactions with: Bestdj77(Chris), 39special(Steve), BPencil, Arcadecrazy, BeatlesGuy, Cammb(Tony), Mantlefan2010(Jonathan), Stlcards(Dan), Sean C, nkesterke09(Nicholas), Darwinbulldog(Glenn) & Ebay users: phil8ball, begsu1013, kmas55, Peter Spaeth, bigfish, Greg Nazareth, PhillipAbbott79, DanB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2017, 02:08 PM
Bestdj777 Bestdj777 is offline
Chris
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,226
Default

I was just thinking about this today as I flipped through 1987 Topps cards to sort out stars. It's hard not to consider 30 year old cards vintage. But, I think I'll decide the vintage category into good vintage and bad vintage.
__________________
Mantle Master Set: 425/425 (complete!!!)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2017, 02:34 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,374
Default

I have never considered late 70s as vintage. My cut off would be 1973, the last set with high numbers, 1974 cards being issued as a single series. 80s cards are not and will never be vintage in my mind.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2017, 02:48 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 14,263
Default

To me modern starts with multiple manufacturers in 1981. For quite some time I cut off my own collection at the Brett rookie in 1975 -- should have kept it that way!!
__________________
Buy high, sell low.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2017, 02:48 PM
smellthegum smellthegum is online now
Dave Waugh
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 68
Default

Vintage is anything older than I am!
__________________
In progress
----------------------------------
1952 Topps low EX- EX/MT 285/310
1967 Topps NM 354/609

Eventually
----------------------------------
1954 Bowman
1957, 68, 69, 72 Topps
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2017, 03:53 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 2,789
Default

I'd put the cutoff in the 1970-75 range. It will be quite a while before junk era cards will be considered vintage in my opinion. I see your point about production numbers, but to me vintage is more than just a certain number of years old. There has to be some element of desirability and rarity.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.

http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/pokerplyr80
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2017, 06:10 PM
Rookiemonster's Avatar
Rookiemonster Rookiemonster is offline
Dustin
Dustin Mar.ino
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nj
Posts: 1,325
Default

When I was a kid ( 1990s) I was talking to a old time dealer. It was in Garfield NJ his name was Bob he had a mustache and was always smoking( yes in the card show ). I ask him what he thought and he said most people thought 1969 and back was vintage. He also told me that 1969 Topps WAS OVER PRODUCED. So I always just kept 1969 as the cut off for vintage. But I do agree that the 80s should be vintage in today’s world.
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2017, 07:56 PM
silvor silvor is offline
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 76
Default

I just got back into collecting again this year, so FWIW... I guess I always figured "vintage" was 1980 (or a case could be made for 1979).

Mostly because there was just one company, AND we never considered the cards worth much money. That is until the price guides came out and were around (at least in my circles) in the early 80's.

But, 1973 really makes more sense because at least some of the cards were more rare.

Last edited by silvor; 12-24-2017 at 07:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-25-2017, 02:53 AM
drcy's Avatar
drcy drcy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,163
Default

Your definition will depend on your age
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Determining autographs on signed bats t206wagner Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 2 09-23-2017 03:51 PM
Need help determining year and some players on two postcards btcarfagno Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 10-25-2016 07:54 PM
Determining Value?? Archive Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 1 01-19-2008 05:27 AM
Why isn't Rarity the No.1 factor in determining a card's value? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 07-06-2006 07:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.


ebay GSB