1879 Providence Grays Team CDV - Copy? What do I have here?

[baseball tourist]

I should add that a buyer who bids , wins and pays asking price and shipping for an item is hardly. "getting one over on a seller".

[thecatspajamas]

Originally Posted by baseball tourist

I should add that a buyer who bids , wins and pays asking price and shipping for an item is hardly. "getting one over on a seller".

"Thought I might have stumbled on a steal" is synonomous with "getting one over on a seller" to me. Maybe I misread that, but you clearly seemed to be excited that you had gotten a deal on something because the seller didn't realize what they had, which is what I meant by "getting one over on a seller."

My advice is to always ask questions if you have any doubt as to what you are buying. I do understand that some situations may warrant a "leap of hope," but if you're willing to take such leaps, you also have to accept that you will sometimes fall flat, and it's unsportsmanlike to pull the seller down with you without at least asking if that's okay.

[dell webb]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

"Thought I might have stumbled on a steal" is synonomous with "getting one over on a seller" to me. Maybe I misread that, but you clearly seemed to be excited that you had gotten a deal on something because the seller didn't realize what they had, which is what I meant by "getting one over on a seller."

My advice is to always ask questions if you have any doubt as to what you are buying. I do understand that some situations may warrant a "leap of hope," but if you're willing to take such leaps, you also have to accept that you will sometimes fall flat, and it's unsportsmanlike to pull the seller down with you without at least asking if that's okay.

I totally agree

[baseball tourist]

Originally Posted by dell webb

I totally agree

All great points, but pls note that one locates and bids on an item especially as the first bidder one would not typically need to reread the listing over and over. I had not seen the Q&A and should not be expected to look for pertinent details such as an item listed in an antique photo section with no hint that the item may be a repro is now, after listing and with bidding activity is now possibly identified as a repro.

If I were selling this and had accepted new and crucial info like this I would either a) end the auction and re-list the item as a repro or email my bidders and tell them.

[dell webb]

The seller posted that he believed it to be a reprint on August 27th and you continued to bid up until SEPT 2. Do what you believe is right but if I was the winning bidder I would feel very uncomfortable asking for a refund.

[bmarlowe1]

FWIW - it's the 1882 team, not the 1879 team

[celoknob]

Originally Posted by baseball tourist

All great points, but pls note that one locates and bids on an item especially as the first bidder one would not typically need to reread the listing over and over. I had not seen the Q&A and should not be expected to look for pertinent details such as an item listed in an antique photo section with no hint that the item may be a repro is now, after listing and with bidding activity is now possibly identified as a repro.

If I were selling this and had accepted new and crucial info like this I would either a) end the auction and re-list the item as a repro or email my bidders and tell them.

In my view, this is a reasonable analysis.