NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-30-2010, 06:56 PM
magic1313 magic1313 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66
Default SGC Grading Question

Let me preface this by saying that I know nothing about grading cards. That being said I just got my submission back from SGC. The Cy Young card came back as an A. I realize that there is a mark in the lower left corner and the back has stains and the dye from the album that the card was once glued into, so I know it wouldn't get a high number, but to me, and judging from grades on my other submissions this should have gotten a number grade. There were a few cards that made me scratch my head. Please let me know if I am wrong and why this card should be graded as an A. I always love to learn from the experts. Sorry for the poor photos. If better ones are needed let me know and I will see what I can do.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_9109.jpg (18.4 KB, 353 views)
File Type: jpg 100_9108.jpg (14.7 KB, 356 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2010, 06:59 PM
Bamacollection's Avatar
Bamacollection Bamacollection is offline
Lance G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Baton Rouge Area
Posts: 567
Default

I looks slightly trimmed on the left border, from the front. Other than that, it is a fine example.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:03 PM
magic1313 magic1313 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66
Default

I believe at some point these cards where glued into at least 2 albums so it is possible it was trimmed but I find it odd that only one card out of 330+ was trimmed and the rest were not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:04 PM
jp1216's Avatar
jp1216 jp1216 is offline
J0N PEDEℜSѺN
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,388
Default

I see the same thing - left side appears trimmed. Width didn't match up to the SGC holder. Tough call...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:07 PM
magic1313 magic1313 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66
Default

Cool. Like I said it is possible and I know nothing about grading so I myself wouldn't be able to detect the trimming. Maybe the others are trimmed as well. I have about a dozen examples that are head scratchers including some boxing cards that just don't make sense to me, especially when compared with other cards of the same series that received a number grade. I also have 100's of t206 cards that have that same gap on the left that received number grades.

Last edited by magic1313; 03-30-2010 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:13 PM
Chicago206 Chicago206 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 330
Default

I have never seen so much top border on a T206 card before. Is that card very oversized?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:18 PM
magic1313 magic1313 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66
Default

The top border is larger than any other t206 that I have and the bottom is not smaller which might indicate a miscut.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:05 PM
old-baseball's Avatar
old-baseball old-baseball is offline
Kevin Andrews
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,150
Default

I don't have the card in the holder scanned yet, but I submitted this E121-80 with paste / glue on the back and it was graded as a 20 - Fair by SGC. There must be something else, maybe the mentioned trimming on your card.

__________________
Kevin Andrews
old-baseball@sbcglobal.net
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SGC Grading question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 10-27-2008 08:30 AM
SGC is grading onsite in the Corporate area of the National. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 08-01-2008 11:19 AM
T-206 and SGC grading questions Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 09-07-2007 05:52 AM
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 09-08-2006 12:36 AM
Question about submitting N172 Old Judges to SGC Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 09-27-2003 10:06 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.


ebay GSB