|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The peculiarities of the different backs is very confusing to me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rea
Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Michael, seems the Board is happy with your decision to ignore my advice to pick up that Magie error SGC 30, instead of the proof. So if you cant beat'em, join'em. Great proof!! I guess I gotta get me a proof one of these days.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I understand Larry's point about relative scarcity, but to me even if it's 100 or more a Ruth rookie card is still a much bigger deal than a 1/1 60s Mantle issue. Mantle -- great player, all the more so because of the perfect storm that made him an icon. But Ruth is on another level, and it's prewar. It's all a subjective judgment though.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Happy that members here got my Ruth Premium and my beloved Allegeny.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks guys.
Ryan- ha, was easy to choose the proof over the Magie, since it was less than half the price! (Jay/T206Kid)- nice pick up on the SGC 10 Magie, that was in my crosshairs too. Glad you got it. Last edited by MVSNYC; 05-08-2018 at 02:28 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I also really like the proof T206. I always seem to stare at them when I see them and realize a while later that I've been in a blank stare for some time and don't remember the last few minutes.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks! I'm really excited. Stuck in that bid thinking I had very little chance to win, and many refreshes later it held. Sweet proof!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have no confidence the pictures will work - but I also didn't think I'd win either of these so who knows....
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So, besides the blank back, Famous & Barr and Standard Biscuit versions, are there any other Ruths that are generally considered to be from the earlier "M101-5" series? |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I just got my cards from the last REA auction and unfortunately got shorted like I feared.
I won this auction: https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c...=MyBids-101116 It said 14 cards, and listed 14 cards in the description. However the photo only showed 13. On the paperwork with the check I mailed I wrote and circled/underlined for them to verify that they are sending 14 cards. Sure enough, 13 showed up in the mail today. Missing the Lord, PSA 6.
__________________
WTB: Autographed 1984 USFL Reggie White, 1955 Len Ford, 1986 Wilber Marshall, 1957 Johnny Unitas |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
That was a Heritage auction, not REA
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Oops, good eye. I had recently a bunch of REA emails from the auction mixed in with my tracking emails that my mind blended the two together.
__________________
WTB: Autographed 1984 USFL Reggie White, 1955 Len Ford, 1986 Wilber Marshall, 1957 Johnny Unitas |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Ben, awesome Matty! I was watching that one myself, but picked up the Dark Cap CB instead. Can’t go wrong owning a Matty dark cap 7.5. Congratulations
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Rea
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Successful Farming is also m101-5, although no Ruths have been confirmed. Be careful with either Standard Biscuit and Morehouse if you insist on trying to land an m101-5, as those advertisers also issued cards parallel to m101-4.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Amazing card Jason - one of my favorite in the whole auction. Congrats
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In regards to the Standard Biscuit and Morehouse cards (Ruth in particular), how can you differentiate between the M101-5 and M101-4? Is it just by the tone of the stock? For example, I assume that the PSA 2 is an M101-5 and the PSA 4 is an M101-4. It also seems that M101-4 cards are taller and thinner than M101-5s. Is this true? |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Was happy to upgrade with this baseball currency note. These are hard to find in decent condition. Jerry Spillman did an article on these notes in the April 2018 issue of the Vintage Collector by Beckett. Some corrections need to be done with the article, as he was off on some of the advertisers and their locations including this pickup. The Jeweler is actually located in Cadiz, Oh and not Chicago, IL as published.
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Kevin,
I have never seen a Morehouse Ruth, so can offer no opinion there. As for Standard Biscuit, I have only seen three, and only that number have been graded by PSA and SGC- the two you show and an SGC 40. You are correct in identifying the two (the SGC 40 is from the earlier m101-5 also). There are stock and a couple of production identifiers that help differentiate the two. With Standard Biscuit the creamier or more golden-looking stock, particularly noticeable on the back, is very seldom found on m101-4 cards. Standard Biscuit was likely the first advertiser to receive m101-5 or D350-1 cards, and the stock is easily seen as non-white, although it can vary in degree. Ruth cards from m101-5 usually have that print flaw most have observed-- a line from the right border that extends toward anywhere from about his left elbow in some cards to around the sleeve of his undershirt in others. It too varies in degree, and is hard to see in your scan but is there. M101-4s will not show that line. Many m101-4s with department store advertising (and some blanks) have print pressure lines running horizontally about 40% from the top and/or vertically 15% from the right edge, starting at the bottom. Your PSA 4 Ruth scan shows the vertical line-- it runs from the bottom of the card up through his lifted ankle. Here is a blank-backed Ruth that shows a more pronounced line: This is another sign that it lines up with m101-4, and although this "flaw" is not found in all cards from that latter set, it is not seen in m101-5. Along with the whiter stock, it is pretty safe to say the PSA 4 Standard Biscuit is from the m101-4 set. As for the size/dimensions of the different Standard Biscuits, I do not believe we have enough of a sample size to say that one is taller or wider than the other. In general this is not apparent for m101-5 vs m101-4 or Standard Biscuit cards overall.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 05-09-2018 at 01:48 PM. |
|
|