PSA & Qualifiers...They're the only ones...

Archive · #1 07-09-2007, 09:19 PM

Posted By: rand

I was thinking about SGC, GAI, SCD, ect...How come PSA is the only company that uses qualifiers? I think its interesting about Beckett's sub grades and has a half point scale. What do you all think about (OC) (MK) (PD) ect...do you like them? how come the other companies do not use their own version?

Archive · #2 07-10-2007, 07:48 AM

Posted By: Glyn Parson

MK is the only one i like or think is necessary.

Archive · #3 07-10-2007, 07:54 AM

Posted By: Steve f

My simple belief is that all cards be 'Authenticated' and if applicable, tagged 'altered' if any Improvements are found. (The new Gretzky Honus owner may be able to sleep better?)

To respond to your question. Qualifiers from sloppy factory snafus; Miscut, Print Defect or Off Center are hogwash. Deduct this from the grade. Human causes, ie Stained or Marked should note 'Q' option as it is now.

Archive · #4 07-10-2007, 07:40 PM

Posted By: rand

I think the (oc) and (mc) sometimes over lap, i see alot of psa cards that could go either way, again, is it necessary?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A Silly Post about PSA and Qualifiers	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	06-25-2008 09:19 PM
Looks like PSA finally got rid of qualifiers	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	5	04-06-2006 05:41 PM
What are all the qualifiers	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	06-12-2005 04:40 PM
PSA 1 Qualifiers	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	11	05-01-2005 09:41 AM
Did PSA originally not have qualifiers?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	16	03-07-2005 11:41 PM