Fake?

MattyFan · #1 10-26-2011, 07:21 PM

Saw this on ebay. The Billy Herman and Hack Wilson aren't awful but the rest do not look right. Even before disecting the autographs something seems odd about the ball besides the price.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1931-Chicago...item1e67c9264f

mschwade · #2 10-26-2011, 07:55 PM

I was going to say the pen pressure was the same for all when I read the description and it said they were "enhanced (traced)" so that explains that.

GrayGhost · #3 10-26-2011, 09:03 PM

he has a good rep, but the Hornsby looks bad. Ive never seen one like that. Cuyler not bad. Rest Im not too familiar with.

perezfan · #4 10-26-2011, 11:00 PM

The ball is authentic and is simply traced over (as stated).

But Scott (Gray Ghost) is correct... SC Gaynor probably should have mentioned that the Hornsby is secretarial. It is one of the key signatures on the Ball, so it definitely should be disclosed.

perezfan · #5 10-26-2011, 11:22 PM

NM - double post

thekingofclout · #6 10-27-2011, 12:18 AM

.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fake ring in Huggins and Scott Auction	sports-rings	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	14	09-23-2011 01:42 PM
Fake holders and cards ?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	29	02-06-2009 09:36 AM
Fake T206 Mathewson ??	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	11-29-2007 03:09 AM
Recognizing Fake Goudeys	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	8	07-24-2006 02:34 PM
More fake crap from KY........	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	0	03-21-2005 08:47 AM