What is the toughest rookie card of the 1960s?

[1963Topps Set]

I would of thought the 1967 Topps Seaver would be the toughest. It is a high number in the rough high number series of 1967 Topps and I believe a single print. It always appears here on everyone's want list.

[mckinneyj]

My top 2 would be also the 66 G Jackson and 62 Uecker - maybe not as expensive as the bigger stars but seemingly much scarcer. Out of the big stars I'd guess that Seaver is the most difficult to find followed by Rose.

[profholt82]

The 60 Yaz, while quite common, is tough to find in nm condition. I find that the ink is almost always smeared.

[rats60]

The Seaver is easily the toughest of those. Ryans are common. Jacksons are easy too. I agree that the Grant Jackson would be the toughest of all. After the Seaver, Rose, Stargell and Uecker, but 62 and 63 high numbers aren't as tough as 61, 66 and 67. Don't forget about the 67 Carew, even though it is a DP.

[lowpopper]

Value aside, Seaver got em all beat. It's not even close.

[1963Topps Set]

The 1967 Topps Seaver card was the last card I needed to complete the decade of the 1960s! I remember when the 1965 Topps Carlton rookie was hot stuff and very valuable, must that must of fallen off the radar by now?

[pclpads]

'66T Choo Choo Coleman.

[hcv123]

Originally Posted by 1963Topps Set

I would of thought the 1967 Topps Seaver would be the toughest. It is a high number in the rough high number series of 1967 Topps and I believe a single print. It always appears here on everyone's want list.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...ookie&_sacat=0

111 give or take on ebay right now - wouldn't exactly call that "tough"

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by hcv123

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...ookie&_sacat=0

111 give or take on ebay right now - wouldn't exactly call that "tough"

30 of those 111 either have "RP" or "Reprint" in the title. Then there were still several other reprints that didn't have either in the title.