|
|
View Poll Results: Shound Barry Bonds and/or Roger Clemens be inducted into the HOF? | |||
Bonds - in | 78 | 50.00% | |
Bonds - OUT | 78 | 50.00% | |
Cemens - in | 76 | 48.72% | |
Clemens - OUT | 77 | 49.36% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
When I say cheating is cheating, I mean if you'll cheat at the little things, you'll cheat at the big things to. If you'll steal a little item, you'll steal a big item too. If you tell a little lie, you'll tell a big lie too. You get the point. I just don't understand how someone can say Bonds doesn't deserve to be in the HOF for cheating, when others have cheated too. What is your measuring stick? When does the cheating become a bannable offense? So, it's OK to cheat and throw a spitball, used a corked bat or whatever and get into the HOF, but it's not ok to cheat and use performance enhancing drugs and get into the Hall? What kind of stupid crap is that? Both are cheating, both have the same intent which is to get an advantage. So a spitball is OK, but steroids are a bannable offense? Gotcha. Where's the middle ground? Where's the gray area? In Packs world, where is the baseball cheating line drawn between a bannable offense and a slap on the wrist? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Baseball has already decided when too much cheating is enough. There is a sliding scale of penalties and it ends with banishment.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
So what does it say about steroids and the HOF?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It wouldn't say anything about it because the two are separate entities.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My point exactly. So, I repeat the question. Why are some players kept out of thr HOF for cheating and others are not?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What point? The Hall of Fame is a matter of opinion. It's always been and it always will be. No one needs proof to keep Bonds and Clemens or anyone else out of the Hall of Fame. Public opinion has kept them out. Voting them in would mean that public opinion is that using steroids and HGH to enhance your career is acceptable. As evidenced by their wait, public opinion hasn't decided it is. As evidenced by the inclusion of Gaylord Perry and anyone else you accuse of cheating, public opinion says their offenses aren't as severe.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I am not sure the writers are a proxy for public opinion.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you want to use a shoplifting comparison, then I would say it's like stealing a $.03 piece of bubble gum or a $1000 piece of jewelry. In my opinion, there's no difference. A thief is a thief. If you'll steal something little, you'll steal something big. The consequences may be different, but it's still stealing. Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 01-08-2018 at 07:37 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bonds is now out. Now I'm in the majority.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
There it is again. The consequences of using a corked bat are you sit a few games and pay a fine. The consequences of using PEDs is you don't get into the HOF. I can't think of a more simplistic way of saying it. Your own argument is basically explaining why there's a difference, and why most voters clearly think one offense deserves a stiffer penalty than the other.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
It's a poor analogy. An appropriate analogy would be petty theft vs. armed robbery.
Last edited by packs; 01-08-2018 at 12:38 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I know the difference in the consequences, but I'm saying the consequences should not be different. You have guys, HOF pitchers like Perry and Ford, that pretty much admit to cheating their entire career. Do you really think it's fair that they get in the HOF and someone that used PEDs doesn't? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 01-08-2018 at 02:15 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA vs SGC Poll | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-19-2010 11:39 AM |
What would you do? - poll | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 05-06-2010 06:30 PM |
NEW POLL! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-10-2008 03:02 PM |
New Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 12-21-2006 07:03 PM |
New Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-09-2005 07:30 AM |