|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
1959 Fleer #68 - How to tell if it's counterfeit?
I just recently bought this "Ted Signs" card (big expenditure) and I am wondering about its authenticity. Although it looks absolutely legitimate to me, information on-line indicates that if the front shows a dot matrix sorta thing, it was a 1970's reprint. Is that true? In quickly using a magnifying lens, it seems that could be the case here. I definitely need to examine it more closely. Does anyone have a comparison close-up picture showing what a legitimate one looks like next to a fake one? I don't want to be screwed here if it is a mislabeled reprint, and the clock is running since the return period will expire pretty soon.
SGC obviously had no problem with it, but does anyone have any other insight?? I would appreciate any help. The back of the card has the proper gray (not white) cardboard... 1959fleer68tedsigns.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. Last edited by JollyElm; 09-06-2018 at 05:33 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
In looking at ebay, it seems they all have what appears to be a dot matrix structure to the printing. These all look very, very similar to mine...
s-l1600-4.jpg s-l1600-3.jpg s-l1600-2.jpg s-l1600.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Cardboard connection has this to say--
"Unfortunately, reprints of the elusive #68 card made their way into the hobby during the 1970s, but a skilled eye should*be able to detect them due to the moire pattern on the suit coat and pinkish tint." Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using Tapatalk
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm wondering if the references I keep seeing to 'dot matrix' are actually referring to a moire pattern, which is a far easier thing to instantly detect. Mine is without any moire and no pinkish hue appears on either suit coat, so I'm starting to feel a bit less edgy.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I bought one of the counterfeits for my set. On on bottrom
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams raw G-VG-EX | jason.1969 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-31-2018 07:37 PM |
1959 Fleer Set | 1963Topps Set | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 11-24-2016 09:01 PM |
spotting an '84 fleer update clemens counterfeit? | chaddurbin | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 7 | 04-15-2013 02:58 PM |
FS [3] 1959 Fleer Teds, PSA 3/4 | dnanln | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-30-2010 10:18 AM |
1959 Fleer Indian set | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 3 | 11-09-2006 11:24 PM |