|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I think it depends on the set. I would consider a T206 set complete even without Wagner, Magie, Doyle NY NAT’L, and Plank, because of the extreme rarity of those cards. Same with a 1933 Goudey set sans Lajoie; it wasn’t issued until the following year and has a 1934 design. OTOH, the 1952 Topps high numbers are expensive, not rare. I don’t know enough about the other sets the OP mentioned to weigh in specifically on them. The gray area for me is where to draw the line on rare vs. extremely rare, but I guess that’s a different topic.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1952 Mantle "Error" card.....In case you need a good laugh | russkcpa | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-01-2017 08:10 AM |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
This "Feel-Good" Babe Ruth Signed Ball Story is not going to end well. | sports-rings | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 05-02-2013 08:16 AM |
Announcing "Collectors Forensics Register" - Revolutionizing the Hobby | Collectors Forensics Reg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 98 | 11-12-2010 03:12 PM |
are "A" authentic SGC & PSA cards gaining momentum with collectors/dealers | Thrill-of-the-Hunt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 08-02-2010 07:36 PM |