Show Off your Charles M. Conlon's Type 1 Photos

[clydepepper]

I keep all my type 1 Conlons in this neat little folder I purchased (it was in my price range):

conlon book.jpg

[WahooSam]

Thanks for posting the Speaker.

[horzverti]

Originally Posted by clydepepper

I keep all my type 1 Conlons in this neat little folder I purchased (it was in my price range):

Attachment 337368

Great folder!

[PSACJ]

Here are some more Conlon’s I just added to my collection.

[TCMA]

Originally Posted by PSACJ

Here are some more Conlon’s I just added to my collection.

Nice scores .

[sphere and ash]

I feel strongly that these are not vintage prints (i.e., Type 1) and believe instead that all Underwoods are copy prints of Conlons. Others disagree. The Ruth and Gehrig aren’t mine—I own them only in their uncropped versions.

If anyone has prints of Paschal or Grabowski, I would be a very interested buyer.

[PhilNap]

deleted duplicate post

[PhilNap]

Originally Posted by sphere and ash

I feel strongly that these are not vintage prints (i.e., Type 1) and believe instead that all Underwoods are copy prints of Conlons. Others disagree. The Ruth and Gehrig aren’t mine—I own them only in their uncropped versions.

If anyone has prints of Paschal or Grabowski, I would be a very interested buyer.

Can you share images of your uncropped versions of these?

[sphere and ash]

Originally Posted by PhilNap

Can you share images of your uncropped versions of these?

I’m traveling, but will do it when I return.

[Huysmans]

Originally Posted by PSACJ

Here are some more Conlon’s I just added to my collection.

Great group Andy!

[sphere and ash]

Apparently Henry has evidence that Underwood used Conlon negatives. If such evidence exists, then my assertion is wrong and I apologize. If anyone can access the evidence, it would be interesting.

[horzverti]

Originally Posted by sphere and ash

I feel strongly that these are not vintage prints (i.e., Type 1) and believe instead that all Underwoods are copy prints of Conlons.

Originally Posted by sphere and ash

Apparently Henry has evidence that Underwood used Conlon negatives. If such evidence exists, then my assertion is wrong and I apologize. If anyone can access the evidence, it would be interesting.

I agree with Paul. I also would like to learn more about the evidence. Ideally, I'd like to view the evidence.

[T206Jim]

Here is a collection of 1904 Conlon Type 1 HOFers. 1904 was the first year he photographed baseball.

Griffith, Wagner, Willis
Walsh, Evers, Nichols


1904 Conlons.jpg