|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Ted Williams
Opinions of this Ted Williams? Looks good to me, but the Splendid Splinter has tripped me up before.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
can
Last edited by shelly; 09-18-2017 at 12:08 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting. This supposedly came from a bulk lot of 8x10s from the Ted Williams estate auction at Hunt's.
Thanks for the information. Thought I was finally getting the knack to identifying good 'ole Ted. Back to the drawing board! Last edited by MrSeven; 09-18-2017 at 01:56 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I will bet you that did not come from Hunt auctions.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the "supposed" lot. Wondering if someone pulled a bait & switch.
https://huntauctions.com/live/imagev...t_qual=&closed Last edited by MrSeven; 09-18-2017 at 05:55 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I am wrong. It did come from there web site. I just hate gold liquid pens. They tend to fade and look sloppy.
That was a great guess that the signature was authentic. How did you figure that out. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. Gold pens just always look wrong to me, even when they're good.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I guess I made the assumption that since gold pen is arguably weird/undesirable that why would a forger decide to use it? Last edited by MrSeven; 09-19-2017 at 11:54 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A forger would like to use all the liquid pens. It covers up many mistakes that you would see when it is signed in pen.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Picked it up because it had a nice flow and luckily Hunt Auctions has an auction archive! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Scott <=== photo clothing forensics autograph expert wannabe
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|