|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who was around for Bowman Vs Topps?
When I was a kid, Topps was the only game in town. Would love to hear stories about what it was like as a kid when both Bowman and Topps were available.
Which company was more popular? Who sold more cards? Did most collectors choose one over the other, or collect both? Did candy stores typically stock both or carry only one brand? Was one brand more readily available? Where there regional differences in terms of popularity and availability? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bowman's demise--
I really started collecting as the Bowmans died out. But I had my brother's cards and played with them.
The Bowmans had two major flaws: The Bowmans/card size [there are slight but perhaps crucial differences] were made of flimsier cardboard, and they easily bent in the middle. As kids played more with the cards in those days, this was a serious and chronic ['53-55] short-coming. The console-TV border on the '55 Bowman was an artistic disaster of Edsel proportions. That being said, the '51-52 Bowmans are one of my favorites, and the '53's are generally admired for their photography and spectacular color. Ironically, after Topps won, they down-sized their cards, which became the standard size for more than 50 years now. I like the bigger cards myself. That's what I remember. Doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Funny you mention that. When we talks cards, my dad always laments what happened to what he called his "TV cards" He saved all his sets 57-63, but the 55 Bowman's didn't make it for some reason, and if he did collect the 56 Topps, those were lost too.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Volod's recollections gave me a Rockwell moment just imagining....a precocious, 8 year old Volod in late summer 1952.....
Volod's Dad, "for the last time, no, I will not take you up to Canada in order for you to buy baseball cards." "But Dad," Volod insists "I can't get those Topps high numbers around here. I tell ya, they'll be worth a fortune one day." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
And yes...I can well image those TV console Bowmans didn't go over too big with kids, especially when compared with the '55 Topps. Yet, in the present moment, I find them to have a real nostolgic appeal. Pocess a sort of hokey charm. I lump 'em in with the '68 burlap Topps, which I also seem to like more than most collectors. I also find Rottweilers adorable.
Last edited by theseeker; 04-12-2012 at 01:19 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't mind that set but I CANNOT get into that 1968 burlap set to save my life. I have only a couple cards from that set of my favorite players and that is it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Started with the 1951 issues, as a seven-year-old in an upstate NY town. My father was an avid bowler and took my brother and me with him to the alleys on Friday nights, giving us a buck each to amuse ourselves for several hours. Rather than hang out in the smokey, beer drenched lanes - yep, authorities unconcerned in those days - bro and I spent hours in the dark little mom&pop store next door. There, we mostly pored over comics, but the proprietor had what seemed like mountains of '51 Topps Redback panels and CMAS cards selling for two cents a pack with the stick of nasty caramel. For some reason, he had no Bowman product - maybe a Topps rep talked him into taking an order and he had trouble getting rid of the cards, so he passed on the Bowmans. Did not discover Bowman until the next spring when it seemed like every kid in the schoolyard had thick stacks of '51's and 52's for trade. Significantly, the only '52 Topps cards I can recall seeing were cut-down to match the smaller Bowman, so that the stack would be uniform. Intrigued by those few oddities, I spent that summer searching for Topps in local outlets, which all carried plenty of Bowman, but with no success. I have to think now that Topps may have had difficulty moving its initial offerings upstate and did not make a strong push there until 1953. That year, the competition really picked up, and I bought many packs of both company's product. The '53 Bowman were definitely more attractive and strongly preferred among my peers, although I think the '53 Topps were more plentiful in stores and their gum may have been better. As a Braves fan, I scoured stores that summer trying to find more '53 Bowmans, since I had only commons and never did unwrap a Spahn or Matthews - until some 30 years later. I think the '53 Bowmans for the most part disappeared from store counters in my town by mid-summer, prefiguring the downturn to come. And, by the next year, 1954, the Bowmans were much harder to find, while it seemed Topps was everywhere. Just my recollection from a limited perspective - I'm sure conditions may have been different in other areas, especially in the large cities.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Steve, I know what the redbacks are but what are CMAS cards with caramel?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry about the abbreviation...
Quote:
Recalling those caramel bars, I feel lucky to still have my teeth. Last edited by Volod; 04-12-2012 at 08:01 PM. Reason: Dead link |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
1951 Topps
I have the 5 Topps 1951 sets ( minus the unissued 3 CAS :-))and one of the unopened packs shown in the blog that has a full 2 panel set of Red Backs, a game board and 4 either CASs or CMASs...can't tell which since they are sandwhiched among the red back panels. Unfortunately the two stacks of panels are bound together at the perforations with two small rubber bands. The rubber bands have probably not taken a great toll on the panels given their location, but over6 0 years have surely caused the ASs some pain
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Al - You are describing the cello-pack, right? I have a '51 Topps 5-cent wrapper that held - if my recall is correct - two redback panels with one AS card between. It's as if Topps was actually using the more plentiful redbacks to buffer the delicate AS card against the noxious candy bar, and it was in fact claimed by Sy Berger that the ink used on the cards did interact with the candy to some extent.
Dave hypothesizes that, in the original press runs, the redbacks were always packaged with CMAS's, and the MLAS cards were packaged later with bluebacks. But, in the case of cello's, I suppose you could have either. Is that how you see it? How about taking some x-rays of the pack - you might have a Roberts, Konstanty or Stanky in there - just pulling your cord. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMAZING autographed sports card find! first batch bb commons | JasonD08 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-26-2011 09:52 PM |
Nice selection of vintage singles 1950-1980 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
1950-1980 singles(baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-15-2008 10:08 PM |
1951-1980 baseball singles/items | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-07-2007 10:12 AM |
FS: BIG SELECTION 1950-1980 BASEBALL | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-08-2007 10:07 AM |