 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-26-2017, 09:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
So much for SGCs looking better than PSAs....
Seems like both companies are in race to see which cards' appearance in their holders can be compromised the most. I've noted earlier about PSA putting more and more under plastic or surrounded by baggy (including t206s) and see here below SGC ruining T3s now. I realize it's for security reasons, and SGC has been criticized for floating cabinets. But I, for one, will never buy a card which has a baggy over or around it, and I have almost none of same in my collection. Just an aesthetic choice. I wonder how much I am in the minority on this....
http://www.net54baseball.com/attachm...1&d=1498489428 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGCs | Marty | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 05-19-2016 06:06 PM |
| PSAs for Sale | Marty | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 10-14-2014 01:55 PM |
| F/S: T206 SGC and a Few PSAs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 21 | 07-09-2009 01:22 AM |
| F/S: T206 SGC and a Few PSAs #2 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 06-13-2009 02:38 PM |
| T201 SGCs needed | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 01-03-2008 10:24 AM |
Threaded Mode