NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk

View Poll Results: Thoughts on Kaepernick & the national anthem
If I was owner of the team id cut him - he should move out of usa 41 32.28%
Dont like what hes doing but hes got the right to do it 66 51.97%
I like what hes protesting and id do it too 9 7.09%
Dont care at all 11 8.66%
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-09-2016, 08:16 AM
AustinMike's Avatar
AustinMike AustinMike is offline
Michael
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
The referee heard it (he threw the flag), Lamarr Houston confirmed to the Chicago Tribune that he said it, and the NFL fined him for it...which was upheld even after Kaepernick's appeal.
"The referee heard it" - yeah, like refs are never wrong, right?

"Lamarr Houston confirmed to the Chicago Tribune that he said it" - yeah, "After Colin Kaepernick was penalized for using “inappropriate language” in a loss to the Bears on Sept. 14, Chicago defensive end Lamarr Houston said he didn’t hear the 49ers’ quarterback say anything to him." http://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/...ck-5775952.php He changed his story later.

"the NFL fined him for it" - yeah, now you're either being willfully ignorant by ignoring the original article I linked to or you're lying. Here's a line from the article - "Colin Kaepernick was still fined by the NFL despite the league admitting the quarterback didn't use a racial slur, and no one is quite sure why." Do you see that? The NFL admits the quarterback didn't use a racial slur. And yet you come back with "the NFL fined him for it." A blatant lie.

So you have CK who says he didn't use a racial slur, the ref who says CK did, and LH who said CK didn't say anything and then changed that to CK did use a racial slur, a tape that shows CK saying something like "Get the f--- back," many other people around the incident who are never quoted in any article that I've seen confirming that CK used a racial slur, and lastly, the NFL admitting that CK didn't use a racial slur. And you want to stick with CK used a racial slur and the NFL fined him for it?

Please, continue on without me and don't let the facts get in the way of your witch hunt.
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T
_____________________________
Don't believe everything you think
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2016, 06:45 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinMike View Post
"the NFL fined him for it" - yeah, now you're either being willfully ignorant by ignoring the original article I linked to or you're lying. Here's a line from the article - "Colin Kaepernick was still fined by the NFL despite the league admitting the quarterback didn't use a racial slur, and no one is quite sure why." Do you see that? The NFL admits the quarterback didn't use a racial slur. And yet you come back with "the NFL fined him for it." A blatant lie.
I was willing to let this go, but since someone else bumped the thread, I'm going to clear something up.

You call me ignorant and a liar? Look here, you stupid jackass. Kaepernick was fined $11,000 by the NFL for using a racial slur. It went to arbitration. The arbitrator, Ted Cottrell, reduced the original fine to $5512 stating it was a "clear violation of the rule". So, jackass, if he wasn't fined for using a racial slur, what was he fined for then???? Answer that!

Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 09-21-2016 at 06:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2016, 09:18 AM
jhs5120's Avatar
jhs5120 jhs5120 is offline
Jason S!m@nds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
I was willing to let this go, but since someone else bumped the thread, I'm going to clear something up.

You call me ignorant and a liar? Look here, you stupid jackass. Kaepernick was fined $11,000 by the NFL for using a racial slur. It went to arbitration. The arbitrator, Ted Cottrell, reduced the original fine to $5512 stating it was a "clear violation of the rule". So, jackass, if he wasn't fined for using a racial slur, what was he fined for then???? Answer that!
He was fined for saying F***.

The arbitrator found that there was no evidence to suggest he used a racial slur, but he still did curse. So the fine was reduced to the minimum since rules were technically broken.

I'm sure you knew that since you read the article.

Either way, he is protesting the imprisonment, beating and murder of over one hundred thousand American citizens who did not commit a single crime.

A cause I'm sure every American can support.

Last edited by jhs5120; 09-21-2016 at 09:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2016, 09:41 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
He was fined for saying F***.

The arbitrator found that there was no evidence to suggest he used a racial slur, but he still did curse. So the fine was reduced to the minimum since rules were technically broken.

I'm sure you knew that since you read the article.

Either way, he is protesting the imprisonment, beating and murder of over one hundred thousand American citizens who did not commit a single crime.

A cause I'm sure every American can support.
Actually, no, I didn't read the article. I'm not going to read some bias trash.

The NFL fined Kaepernick for using a racial slur (that the referee heard and Houston confirmed) and it was upheld (but reduced) by an arbitrator.

But I'll take the bait, Jason. Where is the proof that he used the "F" word? Link to video?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2016, 09:59 AM
jhs5120's Avatar
jhs5120 jhs5120 is offline
Jason S!m@nds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
Actually, no, I didn't read the article. I'm not going to read some bias trash.

The NFL fined Kaepernick for using a racial slur (that the referee heard and Houston confirmed) and it was upheld (but reduced) by an arbitrator.

But I'll take the bait, Jason. Where is the proof that he used the "F" word? Link to video?

They link the video in the article (strong language obviously). Along with the arbitrators ruling, the unions response and the excerpt from the NFL rule book that enforces the fine (despite no slur being used).

On a completely unrelated note: I define a man as "willfully ignorant" when he chooses to argue a point, is provided evidence that proves his point wrong, then willfully ignores that evidence and continues with his original argument.

Further, when an American man peacefully protests the imprisonment, beating and murder of over one hundred thousand American citizens by their sworn protectors despite not committing any crime, I support him.

It's a cause every American can get behind.


http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/10/...fl-nflpa-49ers

Last edited by jhs5120; 09-21-2016 at 10:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2016, 10:02 AM
1952boyntoncollector 1952boyntoncollector is offline
ja.ke liebe.rman
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/mysetregistry/set/348387
Posts: 5,743
Default

I like what South Park did...just announce on the PA... " to honor America, please stand, sit or kneel"

Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 09-21-2016 at 10:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2016, 10:20 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
They link the video in the article (strong language obviously).
I looked at the article. I really don't see a video. Can you link it here?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2016, 12:03 PM
jhs5120's Avatar
jhs5120 jhs5120 is offline
Jason S!m@nds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
I looked at the article. I really don't see a video. Can you link it here?
It's embedded into the article. I can link the article for you again...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2016, 10:24 AM
tschock tschock is offline
T@yl0r $ch0ck
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 1,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
Further, when an American man peacefully protests the imprisonment, beating and murder of over one hundred thousand American citizens by their sworn protectors despite not committing any crime, I support him.
Personally, I'm more sincerely interested in the source of this stat.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2016, 11:58 AM
jhs5120's Avatar
jhs5120 jhs5120 is offline
Jason S!m@nds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tschock View Post
Personally, I'm more sincerely interested in the source of this stat.
Of course:

It looks like there may have been over 100,000 in Baltimore alone since 2011: DOJ Investigation of Baltimore PD

Sections 3: BPD Makes Unconstitutional Arrests (page 34):

10,163 arrests were made that were immediately rejected at the station because they were made without merit.

Section 3, part C: BPD Unlawfully Detains Individuals (page 39)

"Local prosecutors described this practice to Justice Department officials as BPD officers making arrests without probable cause on the street, then hours later deciding to “unarrest” when detention and questioning failed to uncover additional evidence. Our review of BPD documents confirmed that BPD uses these unlawful detentions."

They do not have an official count of instances this happens (since not documented), but the DOJ estimates there were approximately 420,000 stops per year, compared to the actually reported BPD figure of 124,000. (Page 25) The DOJ (reasonably) believes that the unrecorded 300,000 stops (in 2014 alone) went unrecorded because they would not have met the constitutional requirement of reasonable suspicion (or charges would've been filed or the stop would've been recorded). Many (if not most) would fall under this unlawful detainment.

Keep in mind that this is just Baltimore.


There have been formal investigations into almost every major police department - I used Baltimore as an example because it is the most recent.

A summary of the number of times the DOJ has investigated police departments: Link

These aren't criminals committing crimes and getting arrested, these are innocent American citizens who are getting detained and formally arrested without cause. The DOJ also discusses unreasonable force on innocent civilians (page 74) and even gets into the BPD practice of "rough riding" (page 112).

I think every American can agree that unlawful arrests and beatings of hundreds of thousands of American citizens is a cause worth protesting.

Last edited by jhs5120; 09-21-2016 at 12:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-21-2016, 06:54 PM
AustinMike's Avatar
AustinMike AustinMike is offline
Michael
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
I was willing to let this go, but since someone else bumped the thread, I'm going to clear something up.

You call me ignorant and a liar? Look here, you stupid jackass. Kaepernick was fined $11,000 by the NFL for using a racial slur. It went to arbitration. The arbitrator, Ted Cottrell, reduced the original fine to $5512 stating it was a "clear violation of the rule". So, jackass, if he wasn't fined for using a racial slur, what was he fined for then???? Answer that!
No, I said you were either being willfully ignorant by not reading the article I linked to or lying, not both. Do you know what the difference is between "or" and "and?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
Actually, no, I didn't read the article. I'm not going to read some bias trash.
And now you admit you were being willfully ignorant. Thanks for clearing that up.

In regards to "Answer that!" - why? Firstly, it was answered in the link. Secondly, you've already proven that you want to keep your head buried in the sand and remain ignorant to any facts that do not comport to your preconceived notions since these facts are "some bias trash," so why waste my time providing you more answers?
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T
_____________________________
Don't believe everything you think
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-21-2016, 07:50 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinMike View Post
No, I said you were either being willfully ignorant by not reading the article I linked to or lying, not both. Do you know what the difference is between "or" and "and?"



And now you admit you were being willfully ignorant. Thanks for clearing that up.

In regards to "Answer that!" - why? Firstly, it was answered in the link. Secondly, you've already proven that you want to keep your head buried in the sand and remain ignorant to any facts that do not comport to your preconceived notions since these facts are "some bias trash," so why waste my time providing you more answers?
I don't have to read your stupid article. The referee heard it, Houston confirmed that he said it, he was fined for it and, on top of all that, Kaepernick is on video lying about it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2016, 08:55 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default Why the protest? I really don't get it.

Let's look at the most recent shooting in Charlotte. That guy had a gun (witnesses saw it), he was ordered to drop it (witnesses heard the commands), he refused to comply and he was shot...by a black officer. So why are the blacks protesting when the facts are clear in this matter? What do they have to protest? It was a clear case of FTC and he was justifiably shot dead. Is this why Kaepernick is refusing to stand for the national anthem? Because an armed black man was ordered to put down his weapon, failed to do so and was shot for it?

Thank you to the Charlotte police department for taking that POS off the street. Keep up the good work!!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2016, 09:09 PM
EvilKing00's Avatar
EvilKing00 EvilKing00 is offline
Steve P
Steven Pacc.hiano
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 2,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy View Post
Let's look at the most recent shooting in Charlotte. That guy had a gun (witnesses saw it), he was ordered to drop it (witnesses heard the commands), he refused to comply and he was shot...by a black officer. So why are the blacks protesting when the facts are clear in this matter? What do they have to protest? It was a clear case of FTC and he was justifiably shot dead. Is this why Kaepernick is refusing to stand for the national anthem? Because an armed black man was ordered to put down his weapon, failed to do so and was shot for it?

Thank you to the Charlotte police department for taking that POS off the street. Keep up the good work!!!
Apparantly dash cam video shows the guy with a gun, im sure it will b released soon
__________________
Successful transactions with: Drumback, Mart8081, Obcmac, Tonyo, markf31, gnaz01, rainier2004, EASE, Bobsbats, Craig M, TistaT202, Seiklis, Kenny Cole, T's please, Vic, marcdelpercio, poorlydrawncat, brianp-beme, mybuddyinc, Glchen, chernieto , old-baseball , Donscards, Centauri, AddieJoss, T2069bk,206fix, joe v, smokelessjoe, eggoman, botn, canjond

Looking for T205's or anything Babe Ruth...email or PM me if you have any to sell.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2016, 09:24 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilKing00 View Post
Apparantly dash cam video shows the guy with a gun, im sure it will b released soon
That's just it though. It doesn't matter what the dash cam shows, blacks are going to ignore the facts and protest irregardless.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My thoughts for the National iowadoc77 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 24 04-22-2015 07:46 PM
Thoughts on the National... GKreindler Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 64 08-06-2014 04:05 PM
2011 Topps Inception Kaepernick Auto #d 500 $95 OBO brian29575 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T 0 01-06-2014 04:56 PM
Some National Thoughts Rich Klein Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 144 08-10-2009 11:12 AM
Thoughts of the National... Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 07-22-2004 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 PM.


ebay GSB