 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
10-02-2006, 08:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph
Posted By: MLSP
What difference does it make whom I am? I have just the same right to voice my option or ask question as anyone own this forum. As you being the moderator what is your problem? Are you trying to hide something or perhaps not let others in on what this forum really knows about the 1916 M101-4 or 5 sets? One thing I do no is that all the different backs that the M101-4 and 5 sets was impossible to make in the year 1916. The reason there is so many blank backs is what was left with no advertisment to place on the backs of these cards. You can take these words to the bank. With all due respect you are in the modern age thinking like most pople do today. Let me tell you something Leon you have to go back to the early 1900's and think as they did. If you can except that then you will learn the real truth, but I think you know that just not telling the whole story. 
|
|
#7
10-02-2006, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph
Posted By: bcornell
Anyone who thinks that 11-year-old was obnoxious or that Joe Orlando deserves no sympathy for his customer service has never bumped up against Tom, aka MLSP. He orbits Neptune.
|
|
#8
10-02-2006, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph
Posted By: jay behrens
The next thing he will be telling us is that all those Goudey's with black ink backs and those red Piedmont t206s are real.
|
|
#10
10-03-2006, 06:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph
Posted By: leon
Not sure where to start but let's just say that every single person on this board, a few years ago? (maybe), told this guy his Thorpe (I think it was) M101-4 Sporting News was fake. Even Bob Lemke told him it was. Tom went onto say it was a conspiracy against him and the books were written to denounce his card.....do I need to continue? It's actually a little humerous. If everyone on this board told me my card was fake I would believe them (especially since his was fake).....Or I could be like Tom and say EVERYONE else is wrong....The card he had had the large white border inside the black line like most of the fakes do. It was a normal reprint/fake. regards
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1916 M101-4 Wheat SGC 70 Ex 5.5 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 09:25 AM |
| 1916 M101-4 Walter Johnson | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2006 02:47 PM |
| 1916 M101-4 Set on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 6 | 03-14-2006 08:37 PM |
| Question about 1916 M101-4 issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 03-14-2006 01:05 PM |
| 1916 M101-4/5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-06-2005 08:06 AM |
.
Linear Mode
