NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2020, 12:47 PM
larietrope larietrope is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 155
Default Opinion-1957 Topps Baseball Set

I have a hankering to complete a 1957 set. I have Mantle, Aaron, and Williams. I know about The Robinsons, Buning, Mays, etc.
How tough is to do today ?
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:15 PM
cardsagain74 cardsagain74 is offline
J0hn H@rper
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 907
Default

There's a fairly tough, more valuable mid-series (which makes the '57 set more difficult and costly to build, relative to how much the whole set goes for). Similar to what goes on with the high numbers of '66 and '67 and some others.

Your best bet is to find a large lot of commons that includes many mid-series, but I don't even know if that's very feasible, as I've always avoided having to build any sets with a tough series for the reason above (other than the '52 Topps)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:18 PM
Eddiez Eddiez is offline
Eddie Zuercher
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Slidell
Posts: 284
Default 57

Depends what condition you are building it in, but it's not a hard set to complete. If you do build one I have a lot of 57s laying around and might be able to help you get a good start. Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:28 PM
toppcat's Avatar
toppcat toppcat is offline
Dave.Horn.ish
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,812
Default

57 mid's are not tough really, it's an easy set to put together, especially since you have some keys. There are no truly difficult vintage Topps regular issue sets, some just cost more than others or are harder in higher grades.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:32 PM
rsdill2 rsdill2 is offline
Robert D!ll!ngham
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 502
Default

I've built Topps sets back to '55 but honestly have burned myself out on them and no longer find the appeal in building large mainstream sets. I've got the keys from '54 and '53 but have no desire to build the sets. As mentioned, its not really difficult, you could buy them all right now if you wanted. But I grew weary chasing short print commons of players I've never heard of. But if you like the set and enjoy it, go right ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:36 PM
commishbob's Avatar
commishbob commishbob is offline
Bob Andrews
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston Tx Area
Posts: 1,369
Default

I finished mine late in 2019. It wasn't overly tough for me as I put my vintage sets of that era together in raw, VG-EX condition. I'm not a centering freak, as long as no part of another card encroaches on the one I want, I'm good. Intact but soft corners are OK and an occasional stray mark on the back (not the front) doesn't bother me. I do buy some of the stars in graded slabs but only as a bit more insurance when buying from folks I don't know. I pull them out and save the flips for some reason. LOL

I started with a handful of stars (both Robinsons and Koufax) and the Orioles team set and a few others. I did what I always do, picked up a fair-sized lot of the commons and lower-tiered stars to get me started.

As mentioned the 4th Series is tougher than the rest. The Kubek and Richardson cards from that series were the last ones I picked up because the 'Yankee Tax' made hunting down decently priced, acceptably conditioned ones harder.

I think the only card I overpaid for was the Mantle/Berra combo card and if I had to do it all over again I'd have more patience but in the end, I'm really glad I built the set. I really enjoy flipping through the binder.

-----
edit...I meant to mention that I still lack one checklist and one of the four contest cards. In my mind the checklist are part of the set, the contest cards are just a fun insert and I won't be too upset if I never pick that last one up. Both the checklists and contest cards have a couple easy-to-find and a couple tough-to-find pieces. At least that's been my experience.
__________________
People are crazy and times are strange, I used to care but things have changed -Dylan

Last edited by commishbob; 06-25-2020 at 01:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-25-2020, 03:26 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,406
Default

On the positive side, it is 'only' a 407 card set, so you have a decent chance of getting to the end quicker than many of the other monstrous sets from the 60's and 70's.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-25-2020, 03:35 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,449
Default

One of the easier old Topps sets to put together. Lot of HOF rookies, but they are fairly cheap.

Throw out the price guide, Brooks Robinson will cost more than the Mantle (may not be the case if you only buy 4 sharp corners), it's a popular rookie and in the tough series. The mid series also has Richardson, Kubek, Bunning, and Koufax. Unless you are a Yankee fan, Richardson and Kubek can be annoying to pay up for.

The short printed 3rd series is not that difficult though, much more available than many other Topps short printed series. 407 cards is not that many for Topps and most commons are acquired cheaply.

There are no 'true variations' to pursue, just a ton of recurring print defects and color toning changes that seem to be the result of Topps experimenting with color photos for the first time. The Checklist other than the first 2 series suck to pay for, but aren't numbered and many exclude.


It's a fun set. The first I finished in my 1951-1972 Topps run was the 71's and the 57's. Big step down in quality from 1952-1956, but still a cool set that I frequently take out and enjoy with some great photos.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2020, 05:59 PM
wdwfan wdwfan is offline
Emlily Ell.is
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,043
Default

I started one a few months ago, but I'm still a long ways away. I'm less than 300 cards into the set. But it's been fun thus far. I've been looking for VG-Ex to Ex with no creases, bends, indentations or wrinkles and decent centering, about like the card pictured below.



As far as costs involved, I traded for a lot of around 200 to start. There were probably 150 different in that lot. I believe I traded about $150 in random inserts, RCs and refractors from 2019 and 2020 products. It was a nice way to get started. Since then I've traded for some at the LCS, bought a few at another LCS, traded for and bought some on here and Beckett.

Overall, I probably have about $150 into the set thus far. I don't have Mantle or Mays or Williams, but I've got lots of stars like Spahn, Hodges, Kluszewski, Doby and Ashburn. I also have Maz RC ($23), Martin ($10) and Colavito RC ($21) incoming. So that will add some more value to my set.

Then there's the tougher, mid series everyone's mentioned. It is a little more difficult to find, and they sell closer to BV than the other cards in the set do. But they're obtainable.

Anyway, hope this insight helps. Good luck if you decide to build the set.
__________________
Anyone on Twitter? Here's my new handle
@1millionrangers

I have done deals with: snowman, exhibitman, roquan, vintagetoppscards, bobsbbcards, sayitaintso, tsp06, gorditadogg, 4reals, bnorth, clydepepper, jcfowler6, jimmer77, tsp06, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, swk473 plus others.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2020, 11:19 PM
MikeGarcia MikeGarcia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,798
Default Good Choice , the '57's



..It is overall a truly beautiful set to page through , unless you are an anal-retentive obsessive-compulsive centering weenie......in that case building a centered complete 1957 Topps set in ''mid-grade''condition is a challenge for the normal collector's budget.... heck , even the four contest cards and the eight checklist cards are off-centered.......but if you don't insist on centered fronts then it's a neat set to build , with great players and great poses and the info on the backs is very informative and well done . Good hunting.

.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-26-2020, 12:05 PM
Bigdaddy's Avatar
Bigdaddy Bigdaddy is offline
+0m J()rd@N
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,836
Default

I really enjoyed putting this set together and finished it up about a year ago. I was not planning on tackling it, but ran across a lot of the cards at a local card show that I couldn't pass up. A dealer had over half of the set and was selling them individually and I started going through his stash and ended up making a deal for the entire lot - over half the set. The cards were mostly well centered, had good registration and probably in EX condition. They were from a complete set that he had started selling, so there were no duplicates. The downside was that each had a stamp and someone's initials on the back. I put my T206 backstamp hat on though and looked at that as an interesting bit of provenance . He even had the Brooks RC that I bought separately from the lot.

I already had the Mays and Williams and several other star cards, but had to pick up a Mantle and Koufax and the aforementioned Richardson and Colavito RCs.

The 1957 Topps issue is a great set and has what I consider one of the most iconic Topps cards of all time - the 'Dodgers Sluggers' card. One of the last cards in the set and showing Brooklyn's Boys of Summer in the setting sun of Ebbets Field. Closing out the day, the set and the glory of their time in Brooklyn.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dodgers sluggers.jpg (81.1 KB, 171 views)
__________________
Working Sets:
Baseball-
T206 SLers - Virginia League (-2)
1952 Topps - low numbers (-1)
1954 Bowman (-5)
1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2)

Last edited by Bigdaddy; 06-26-2020 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-26-2020, 01:02 PM
BillP BillP is offline
Bill par.sons
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 267
Default

Not my favorite set but put it together and upgraded it a few times over due to registry issues on some of my cards. That's the only issue I have with this set is the focus of some of the stars and 4th series cards. The Ted and Mays in particular I settled for a lower grade corner wise but better focus. I also like the fact that with topps moving to a smaller size card that year, the pictures to me appear to be all new shots taken in 56 and 57 for the cards. I also prefer years were full stats are on the card. In short I think this set is very collectable and can be put together in a reasonable time frame.

billp
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-28-2020, 06:28 PM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 457
Default

I completed a nice VG/EX a few years back. It wasn't too hard. Most of the commons at a buck per at the shows. Completed most of the the semi commons at $2 per. Stars weren't ridiculous - even the Mantle. Brooks Robinson stands out as the toughest to find at a reasonable price. I got lucky on an ebay purchase, but havent seen too many bargains since.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lot of 36 1957 Topps Baseball 36.00 vic 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 04-12-2019 11:00 AM
FS: 32 different 1957 Topps baseball - all signed scooter729 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 08-16-2018 08:29 PM
FS 80 1957 Topps Baseball Cards VG-EX to EX-MT Northviewcats 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 09-21-2017 03:33 PM
1957 Topps baseball Tools of Ignorance 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 04-15-2017 09:31 AM
Lot of 16 1957 Topps Baseball VG-EX and up oskafagus 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 08-19-2012 01:11 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 AM.


ebay GSB