 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-09-2017, 10:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Which Card Sets Should be Re-Classified?
From time to time I see very compelling arguments that some vintage sets should be re-classified with a different designation (a T-card to a D-card, etc.). For other sets, an argument can be made that they should be grouped into (or removed from) an existing set...the T213-1's and Ty Cobb backs come to mind, respectively.
The hobby's forefathers did an amazing job in classifying so many of these sets and we owe them much. I think that now, after decades, it's only natural to see some additions and revisions to their important work. Curious to hear the thoughts of others on vintage sets that may fall into these categories. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1959, 1973 BB Partial Sets, '76 & 77 complete sets, 2016 Topps rare sets!! 11/29 End | wolf441 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-29-2016 08:31 AM |
| What if..Burdick had classified T206's with respect to their individual 15 T-brands ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 02-25-2010 11:09 AM |
| Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-23-2008 08:52 PM |
| Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-04-2002 04:07 PM |
| Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 04-26-2002 08:57 AM |
Threaded Mode