 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-14-2014, 07:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Variations - Just Curious
In all likelihood there is no answer to this question but I'll try to get a response anyway. Why are some cards recognized as variations and some cards that exhibit the exact same inconsistencies are not recognized? 1971 Jim Nash w/ Smudge = variation. 1966 Lou Brock w/ pink smudge on top border = not recognized. 1957 Gene Bakep = valuable variation but little more than a print smudge on reverse but 1957 Luis Arroyo with black smudge on cheek (about 10% of the Arroyo's have this exact smudge in the same place) = not variation. I could go on and on but you get the idea. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT: Just Curious... A Little Help? | irishdenny | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-20-2014 09:01 AM |
| Just curious.......... | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-11-2012 11:05 AM |
| T206 - Cubs w/ all back variations. 559 variations!!?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-26-2009 08:28 AM |
| This is Curious | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-25-2003 09:33 AM |
| MW- I am curious | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-12-2002 06:31 AM |
Threaded Mode