 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-04-2004, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Another novice question
Posted By: rob
Issue regarding the T213 series once again, which I assume would apply to the T206 and most cards of that ilk. Was it common for the sizes of the cards to be slightly different as far as width is concerned. Is it just a sign of the times where they were cut by hand or does it indicate some altering. I dont believe I have any card(s) that have been trimmed, but I was wondering if I should be curious of this size disparity. My assumption is given the era that there is "similarity" in size and as opposed to exactness, but I would appreciate knowledgable (as opposed to my assumptions) feedback on the issue. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question from a game-used-bat novice | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 02-12-2008 04:11 PM |
| Novice question: PSA "Authentic" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-26-2007 02:28 PM |
| Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2007 08:27 PM |
| Question from a Grading Novice | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-18-2005 05:00 PM |
| Reprints of Baseball cards in book - Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-30-2005 02:37 PM |
Linear Mode
