|
#251
|
|||
|
|||
I've decided to get more into collecting lower grade vintage as it's a lot easier on my wallet and can get more for the money. Been debating though about a paper loss 57 Mantle, under a 100 dollars but the paper loss is on the front but none of the text or image of Mantle is fine and otherwise it's a great looking card. I've been okay with back paper loss if it's nothing major if it's not a blank back. But on cards like this it's tempting on something i might not otherwise get into my collection.
|
#252
|
|||
|
|||
Centering is important to me, but mid grades is the way for me
On my budget I need to use lower grades. I have a 58 All Star of Williams that's really nice and it's a 6. So I will keep looking for at least 5s and 6s. I grew up in late 50s and 60s and I'd like to have a nice collection of the players I enjoyed back in the day. Now if someone would let me know how to post my pics I'd sure appreciate it.
Brian (southeast Iowa's largest Yankee fan) |
#253
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
#254
|
||||
|
||||
Mid-Grade Collectors
Some recent lower-mid pickups that spoke to me. All technically lower grade, but I think they do well in the eye appeal department. In keeping with our theme here, all of these cost me a fraction of the price of graded examples that probably would have been only a few notches higher - mainly due to technicalities & small issues:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-28-2021 at 12:23 PM. |
#255
|
||||
|
||||
Great group of cards, well done!!
Might need to find me some low grade eye candy Koufax in raw form soon! Quote:
__________________
Collecting: Sandy Koufax "Left Arm of God"
Last edited by gustomania; 06-20-2021 at 03:21 PM. |
#256
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
#257
|
|||
|
|||
I have a 1961 topps SGC Hector Lopez coming, hoping tomorrow. Also have a Banks graded a 6 PSA.
Last edited by bammerbb; 06-24-2021 at 10:11 AM. Reason: Not doing something right to post a picture |
#258
|
|||
|
|||
That 69T Mantle is sweet!
RayB
__________________
Legacy Board Member Since 2009. Hundreds of successful transactions here on Network 54. Buy/Sell/Trade with Confidence. |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
Great thread. I really enjoy looking at all of these great cards. Here are some of my favorite mid grades from my collection.
|
#260
|
||||
|
||||
I've been having a good time looking for mid grade cards for my collection.
|
#261
|
|||
|
|||
How is that 67T Aaron miscut but the 64T Rose isn't??
|
#262
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I posted this Musial in the pickups section, but I think it deserves a spot in this thread. I think it's a very nice example of a "mid-grade" card! 1952_Bowman_Musial_1 by boosandpearl, on Flickr Last edited by IgnatiusJReilly; 06-25-2021 at 03:15 PM. |
#263
|
|||
|
|||
Some great stuff here. I've learned more and more to appreciate mid-grade vintage. Here's a few of mine.
|
#264
|
||||
|
||||
Wow, that was a STRONG group of cards right there. This guy gets it!
|
#265
|
|||
|
|||
Help
Have I offended??? I've been hoping someone would tell me how to put in my scans for my few mid-grades. Can't get it done please give me some help.
Thank you. Bammer |
#266
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is something I posted awhile ago, so I dug it up. Hopefully it helps... Do you have scans, pics ready to post? If so, try to get their sizes pretty small (like about 1MB or smaller) so they will readily load up on the site. Then (as you are typing your message) click the 'paper clip' icon on the page as so (highlighted in blue)... stepone.jpg Which will bring up this window... steptwo.jpg Hit "Choose File" and find the image(s) on your computer that you want to post (the screenshot shows that I had already uploaded the 'stepone' graphic) and then hit "Upload." When the file uploads, go back to where you were typing the message... stepthree.jpg And then hit that paper clip again to choose the file you want to add to your post... stepfour.jpg And BOOM!! that's it. There are other ways to upload pics, but this is the most straightforward. (Technical note for clarity: a couple of minor revisions were made to the text after I took screenshots, so some of it doesn't match exactly.) (Of course, now everyone reading this is trying to find those differences. Ha ha.)
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#267
|
||||
|
||||
If you are on a computer, you can attach a .jpg or other picture file if it's not too large. Just click on the paper clip symbol above where you are typing. A "Manage Your Attachment" box will open. Then you click "Choose File" where you will select a file off your computer. Pick your file and click "Open". Once you click "Open" then your file name chosen will appear next to the "Choose File" button. Click "Upload" and the file should upload. You can then Preview Post or Submit Reply if you feel like it's correct. I hope this helps. You may also be able to do a search of previous threads discussing how to post or attach pictures.
There's the post. Thanks Darren. You posted that while I was typing. Last edited by GasHouseGang; 06-25-2021 at 10:05 PM. |
#268
|
|||
|
|||
attach my banks
Here is my Banks, graded 6.
|
#269
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to all who sent me directions. I was hoping to do it this way, but darn I couldn't figure it out. Thanks everyone for your gracious help.
Brian |
#270
|
||||
|
||||
Great cards everyone. Glad to see this thread continuing to get some love. There's nothing better than old cards that show some patina but are still beautiful, IMO. Keep 'um coming!
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
#271
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Ray. I was so busy looking at the ding on the lower left which probably keeps it at VG, that I didn't notice when I bought it how well centered it was. Most '69 Mantles - even in higher grade - have trouble in that dept.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-28-2021 at 12:25 PM. |
#272
|
||||
|
||||
Nobody here bought that $30K Monte Irvin right? Just checking...
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
#273
|
|||
|
|||
I'm more of an "opportunist" than mid grade collector. I can like anything for the right price. Picked these two up at estate auction that I attended with my kid. He was after a Hulk #1 and wound up the underbidder. While we were waiting for that book to come up to the block I grabbed these 2 mid grade cards for cheap.
Last edited by cornhusker; 09-25-2023 at 01:56 PM. |
#274
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
#275
|
|||
|
|||
Not a star card but fits the theme.
Picked up at a local cards show last weekend.
__________________
Legacy Board Member Since 2009. Hundreds of successful transactions here on Network 54. Buy/Sell/Trade with Confidence. |
#276
|
||||
|
||||
Typically this is my domain. I generally collect raw/graded in the 3-6 range mainly due to my wallet. Some higher/lower.
__________________
Successful Transactions: Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911 (I’m sure I’m missing some quality members) |
#277
|
|||
|
|||
I collect mid grade for two reasons. Obviously budget is the biggest, but the second is I think there's more value in mid grade cards. There is often very little visible difference between 5s and 8s or even 9s. I've got 5s and 6s that look significantly better than higher graded versions of the same card. I've yet to see a better looking version of this card in any higher grade, and I probably paid a fraction of what a registry collector paid for an 8 or 9.
|
#278
|
||||
|
||||
There is certainly more variability in eye appeal in the mid-range and lower. PSA 2 through about 6 are good examples. My favorite place to play right now is a card that looks like a 6 or so with nice corners, but only got a 3 or 4 because of a wrinkle or hairline crease or some other surface issue that's difficult to see. I recently got a '66 Jim Palmer RC in a 4. Card looks like a 6 - the grade is due to a wax stain that you can't even really tell is there.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-02-2023 at 08:45 AM. |
#279
|
|||
|
|||
I don’t mind lower to mid grade cards at all.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying collectors grade (F-G) of these 4 1959 Topps | Ed_Hutchinson | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-06-2017 02:50 PM |
FS: Several Collectors Grade 1950s Mantles | j_bodensteiner | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2016 01:55 PM |
Plank, Collins and Evers - Collectors Grade *reduced | Tao_Moko | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2015 09:01 PM |
1971 T goldmine for off-grade collectors ~ 60% of the set! | JElwell | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2014 08:43 AM |
Collectors Forensic Register = Grade Tech Services Inc.? | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-13-2010 10:10 AM |