|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=238568
"As of April 1, 2017 PWCC places blocks on any user ID that has more than 10 bid cancellations in the past six months. This reflects a reduction in the number of allowed bid cancellations from 25 to 10. As the program continues to mature and continues to affect bidder behavior, PWCC will continue to reduce the threshold." Guess not.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-19-2017 at 08:02 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
ETA: Upon further reflection, I certainly understand (as per the scenario in the last thread) why the 2nd bidder in line would want to retract a bid if a higher bidder above them has retracted, thus screwing the underbidder. However, that creates a cascade of retractions, and leads to uneven enforcement of the "policy." The much better way to enforce the policy would be to not only block the IDs, but also to cancel any bids placed by those IDs, even if those bids are deemed to be legitimate. That way, serial-retractors simply cannot participate in PWCC auctions, and underbidder bids will be restored to their proper levels. If the underbidder still has concerns about their max having been exposed, PWCC can cancel the bids on their end and allow the underbidder to re-bid (or not), thereby preventing the underbidder from having to retract on his/her own.
__________________
Last edited by Bliggity; 06-19-2017 at 08:15 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
.. Seriously, all the "complaining and bitching" (most of it anyway) wouldn't have come about had they not put out their policy and in the name of addressing fraudsters, shill bidding, shenanigans of the sort, etc. I don't see what possible purpose there could be to put out a strict, stated policy only to not uphold it? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I think they totally believed they were going to uphold this rule until they found out most of their big spenders were doing it.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
REA Bid Retraction? | e107collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-06-2014 03:07 PM |
A New Rule concerning PM's- Poll | Leon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 24 | 08-13-2012 03:01 PM |
New Board Rule | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 117 | 11-03-2006 02:21 PM |
You guys rule | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-12-2006 01:32 PM |
In all fairness...a comment "retraction" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-14-2002 07:06 PM |