NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:41 PM
Delray Vintage Delray Vintage is offline
Bob
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
Default peck & snyder help please

I see the Goodwin auction has a peck and snyder CDV labeled by SGC, but the back of the card has no reference to peck and snyder. REA has a cdv which is not sold as peck and snyder but SGC has it as a CDV 1869. Can someone tell me if all Peck and Snyder CDV cards omit a peck and snyder reference on the back? If it was a trade card used to push the sporting goods store, why no reference to it? Seems odd.

Last edited by Delray Vintage; 04-14-2011 at 06:36 PM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:12 PM
GaryPassamonte's Avatar
GaryPassamonte GaryPassamonte is offline
GaryPassamonte
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Morris NY
Posts: 1,460
Default

Very few of the Red Stocking CdVs have a Peck and Snyder reference on the reverse. While it is possible CdVs without a Peck and Snyder advertisement on the reverse were issued by Peck and Snyder, there is no solid evidence to confirm they were issued by P&S.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:52 PM
oldjudge's Avatar
oldjudge oldjudge is offline
j'a'y mi.ll.e.r
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Bronx
Posts: 5,353
Default

Gary is exactly right. In fact, I would go so far as to say that they are not Peck & Snyders.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:09 PM
GaryPassamonte's Avatar
GaryPassamonte GaryPassamonte is offline
GaryPassamonte
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Morris NY
Posts: 1,460
Default

Jay,
I think the population data I stated in the prior 1869 Cincinnati CdV thread is skewed. I said there were 22 graded with 17 being trade cards and 5 being CdVs. I believe in the grading world some of the trade cards are CdVs. The figure of 17 includes all P&S cards whether a trade card or a CdV. The 5 CdVs are either blank backed or may have the team line up on the reverse. Although the graded CdVs are still rarer than their trade card counterparts, the difference in population is less than I first stated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 06:35 PM
Delray Vintage Delray Vintage is offline
Bob
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
Default Peck trade cards

So the designation as a Peck and Snyder in the goodwin auction is incorrect? It seems then that only the large size would be from Peck and Snyder. The CDV size would be from other stores or just a team photo not advertising anything. Thanks Gary and Old Judge.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:08 PM
Baseball Rarities's Avatar
Baseball Rarities Baseball Rarities is offline
K3v1n Stru55
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delray Vintage View Post
So the designation as a Peck and Snyder in the goodwin auction is incorrect? It seems then that only the large size would be from Peck and Snyder. The CDV size would be from other stores or just a team photo not advertising anything. Thanks Gary and Old Judge.
No, there are also cdv's known with a Peck and Snyder advertisement on the back. They advertise the the sale of these cdv's in bulk - $.75/12 or $5/100.

I have always found it easiest to differentiate the cards by calling the larger Peck and Snyders "Trade Cards" and the referring to cdv's as just "cdv's."

From talking with several photograph experts, they feel that the cdv's pre-date the larger trade cards. This theory is also backed up with the fact that the cdv has an "Ann St." address for Peck and Snyder while the trade cards have a "Nassau St." address which was their later location.

Last edited by Baseball Rarities; 04-14-2011 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:14 PM
Delray Vintage Delray Vintage is offline
Bob
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
Default Graded CDC with peck and snyder

Kevin is the Goodwin one a Peck and Snyder or is Sgc label a mistake?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:25 PM
Baseball Rarities's Avatar
Baseball Rarities Baseball Rarities is offline
K3v1n Stru55
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delray Vintage View Post
Kevin is the Goodwin one a Peck and Snyder or is Sgc label a mistake?
The one in Goodwin does not have Peck and Snyder advertising. It only has printing on the back that identifies all of the players. I do not know what the "bulk" cdv's that were offered for sale on the back of the Peck and Snyder cdv's look like on the back. They may have just been generic like the one in Goodwin's auction. No way to tell who issued it.

Through the years, out of error, laziness or for simplicty, all 1869 Cincinnati cards have been referred to as "Peck and Snyders' no matter the advertisement on the back, which is where the confusion comes from.

Last edited by Baseball Rarities; 04-14-2011 at 08:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:44 PM
Delray Vintage Delray Vintage is offline
Bob
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
Default

What is really confusing is that REA has a CDV without a P&S designation on the SGC graded card while SGC called the Goodwin one P&S.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2011, 04:37 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

I used to think the P & S trade cards predated the CdV's, but I agree with Kevin and now feel the CdV's are the true rookie cards. Of course, since several different establishments issued them it's pretty difficult to determine which one was the very first.

Last edited by barrysloate; 04-15-2011 at 07:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-15-2011, 05:49 AM
GaryPassamonte's Avatar
GaryPassamonte GaryPassamonte is offline
GaryPassamonte
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Morris NY
Posts: 1,460
Default

I believe SGC may have given the Goodwin as well as the current Heritage Red's CdVs the P&S designation based on the print type and format. The Heritage example has a Chadwick advertisement instead of a P&S ad on the reverse, but the format is almost identical to the known P&S CdVs. The American News on 117, 119, and 123 Nassau St was the agent. It appears The American News was the printer and distributor of the P&S CdVs as well as others with a silmilar print style on the reverse. The Cincinnati team was very famous in America in 1869. The American News cashed in on this popularity.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-15-2011, 04:35 PM
Delray Vintage Delray Vintage is offline
Bob
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
Default

Thanks Gary it sounds like a plausible reason for SGC label as P&S. I see the Heritage one has an address unlike Goodwin so typeface would be only way to attribute it to P&S. I only see one clear P&S reverse on a CDV sold by Mile High in 2010.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peck & Snyder 1869 address - FINALLY !!! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 19 12-02-2004 09:04 PM
Dating the Peck & Snyder "Creighton" Card Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 09-24-2004 11:43 AM
Peck & Snyder OFFICIAL answer!! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 51 07-18-2004 06:00 PM
Peck & Snyder UPDATE !! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 17 07-14-2004 02:58 PM
1869 Peck & Snyder Observation & Question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 79 07-11-2004 03:51 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 AM.


ebay GSB