Its not just moser/pwcc...more trimmers exposed

[Peter_Spaeth]

Good golly Miss Molly.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1925

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Good golly Miss Molly.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1925

Terribly graded imo the 2nd time around with that huge crease.

Who owns that green conby??

[sportscardtheory]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Good golly Miss Molly.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1925

My god. That card is COMPLETELY "restored". How can a card be a 3.5 if it's been cut, flattened, soaked, erased, etc. PSA has some explaining to do. This is criminal.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Good golly Miss Molly.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1925

I'm looking at this from my cell phone so I don't have the advantage of large scans, but that top left corner looks rebuilt from what I can see.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I'm looking at this from my cell phone so I don't have the advantage of large scans, but that top left corner looks rebuilt from what I can see.

As John pointed out, it has undergone significant .... what's the neutral word --- work.

[tschock]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

As John pointed out, it has undergone significant .... what's the neutral word --- work conservation.

Fixed it, after checking the PWCC thesaurus.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by tschock

Fixed it, after checking the PWCC thesaurus.

Thankee.

[perezfan]

That green Cobb exhibits perhaps the most "work" of any of the exposed cards, to date...

With regard to the original, all 4 corners exhibited significant corner creases (in addition to the obvious corner wear). Yet the creases have all seemingly vanished in the "worked" version. Not to mention the cleaning, rebuilding, etc.

Very discouraging.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by perezfan

That green Cobb exhibits perhaps the most "work" of any of the exposed cards, to date...

With regard to the original, all 4 corners exhibited significant corner creases (in addition to the obvious corner wear). Yet the creases have all seemingly vanished in the "worked" version. Not to mention the cleaning, rebuilding, etc.

Very discouraging.

He missed one.
A whisker away from the VGEX designation with a tiny crease to the lower right corner present.

[T206Collector]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I'm looking at this from my cell phone so I don't have the advantage of large scans, but that top left corner looks rebuilt from what I can see.

Here’s how the corners on the 3.5 were described by PWCC when listed:

“Nicely framed with well formed corners for the assessment.”

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by T206Collector

Here’s how the corners on the 3.5 were described by PWCC when listed:

“Nicely framed with well formed corners for the assessment.”

Good ole Brent....

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by T206Collector

Here’s how the corners on the 3.5 were described by PWCC when listed:

“Nicely framed with well formed corners for the assessment.”

More succinctly "a well-formed ass(et)"

What's not to love?