NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post. Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on Ebay
Pre-WWII Cards
Post WWII Cards
Vintage Memorabilia
Babe Ruth Cards
Ty Cobb Cards
Lou Gehrig Cards
Mickey Mantle Cards
Goudey Cards
Bowman Cards
T205s on Ebay
Tobacco "T" Cards
Caramel "E" Cards
Vintage Baseball Postcards
Football Cards on Ebay
Exhibit Cards
Strip Cards
Baking Cards
Sporting News
Playball Cards on Ebay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2019, 03:45 PM
lowpopper's Avatar
lowpopper lowpopper is offline
Greg C
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY
Posts: 285
Default SEDiMENT IN THE PAPER STOCK

Do you think a card with a "bubble" in the stock should get a (PD) qualifier?

If yes, should this have its own qualifier for a stock flaw or lump it into (PD)? ...which is really for Print.

My argument would be that it is a shame to have a Mint looking card get
a PSA 6 or 7 because of a factory stock imperfection that can sometimes
only be seen on an angle.

Interested to hear what the community has to say...
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2019, 06:09 PM
CW's Avatar
CW CW is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,379
Default

I don't feel a PD qualifier would be necessary, but I wouldn't be opposed to a new "SB" qualifier for "surface bubble" since they are usually impossible to see in a scan. I don't feel a bubble should knock a card down 2 grades like a typical qualifier, either.

If I were in charge of grading at PSA my rules of thumb for this type of flaw would be:

1) no card with a surface bubble should get a MINT 9 or GEM MINT 10 grade.

2) a card with a surface bubble should get just a one grade reduction. So if a card would normally grade a 9, the surface bubble knocks it down to an 8.

Last edited by CW; 02-05-2019 at 06:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2019, 06:16 PM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 1,865
Default

You can still get a straight 9 with the stock bubbles you are referring to and you should be able to in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photographic paper stock question. Please help EYECOLLECTVINTAGE Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 2 12-14-2017 12:10 PM
T206 Bill Hinchman (Paper Stock) T206Collector Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 11-28-2016 08:00 AM
N172 Old Judge - Thin Paper Stock (help needed) h2oya311 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 07-07-2012 06:26 PM
Cracker Jack paper stock 1914 vs 1915 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 08-12-2007 08:24 PM
can anyone recommend good paper stock for making baseball cards? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 04-02-2007 09:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.


ebay GSB