Babe Ruth?

[Forever Young]

Originally Posted by Deertick

Not for the thin-skinned!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEJ7l...tailpage#t=43s

awesome

[Scott Garner]

Originally Posted by Forever Young

awesome

+1 Love it!!

[shelly]

Just 400 more to go, Then I will start the old one back up.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by shelly

Just 400 more to go, Then I will start the old one back up.

There was another thread that branched off from this one that had numerous posts as well, but was still discussing this Ruth ticket...be careful or I'll merge them.

[7nohitter]

The future does not hold much without Jim Stinson. Congratulations to the few, meandering rubes who couldn't get heir heads out of their behinds and ran off one of the greatest contributors to this hobby.

And.R.ew Mi.ll.e&r

[earlywynnfan]

Originally Posted by 7nohitter

The future does not hold much without Jim Stinson. Congratulations to the few, meandering rubes who couldn't get heir heads out of their behinds and ran off one of the greatest contributors to this hobby.

And.R.ew Mi.ll.e&r

Couldn't agree more. This forum suddenly got far less important.

Ken

[shelly]

opening up new thread. Your fault Dan

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan

Couldn't agree more. This forum suddenly got far less important.

Ken

Ken, it's just as important or unimportant as it always was. There are always going to be people who would like to see a forum laid out like a publishable book, with themselves and those they respect, as the authors, and the contributors (lesser people such as myself) following rules written in stone.

That's not what a discussion forum is. You have to take the good (expert participation, fun discussions, passionate hobbyists) along with the bad (petty feuds, people on pedestals, violent disagreements).

Or you go write a book and invite Jim and anyone else you respect, to co-author. In any case, Jim will be fine and I'm sure we'll see him around soon enough.