|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Ok excellent thanks for the help. I had a recent offer for one that is PSA Good with a piedmont 42 back, I know the back is a little rare but he wanted $235 for it, I thought that was a little high.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
How long did the project take?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Note I am only collecting the HOFers. The project started late September of this year, so almost 2 months. I have been pursuing these aggressively but I a have been mindful of price along the way.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
A mouth open Collins Pied 42??? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What are the ??? for on the Collins Piedmont 42?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Well what I have found is the variations in the set are nearly void of any backs like pied 42, AB, BL, and Cycles. I would love to see this card. The price is good if the grade/condition warrants it, but pied 42's command little premium if none at all still. It's just a matter of time just like the AB's are starting to fetch a bit more regularly, and cycles with certain players. More collectors means less cards. Less cards drive up prices and especially with the less common backs.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The grade is a PSA 2. So I was willing to go a little higher but $235 was a little too high for now. If it was a Cycle back I would have paid that. I like the various rare backs but not as much keen on the factory number. I was close with the deal but not quite there, I would say $200 would have been more suiteable |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew, I don't own this one anymore, but here is a Collins Piedmont 42.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Where were those other 2 sold at?
This could possibly mean this card will also be found with an AB back. Cycle, Drum and Broadleaf's are "Seeming" to not be possible if I am right about some research I have been mapping out. I would stop eating for a month to be able to bid on that |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I finally got it in the mail today here it is I tried to take the best pic I could of the Pied 42 on the back the best I could. It looks like it got a 2 because of the very light paperloss on the back
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
((((Well what I have found is the variations in the set are nearly void of any backs like pied 42))))
From my tracking of Peidmont 42s I have found the following variations come with Pied 42 backs. Barger - Partial B Collins - Open mouth Ford - White cap Wiltse - Right ear Their are also ones on back variations Hoblitzell - name incorrect - no Cin Hoblitzell - name correct - no Cin Moran - stray line of type Wallace - no cap - 2 lines of 1910 stats Hope this info helps. I have scans of some if needed. Last edited by nebboy; 12-09-2011 at 08:29 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for the info regarding Piedmont 42's. Any chance you have a scan of the Hoblitzell Name Incorrect, No Cin. w/ a Piedmont 42 back? I was always under the impression that the Name Incorrect, No Cin. only existed with a Sweet Caporal Red reverse. My Collins example: Regards, Turner Engle Last edited by asoriano; 12-09-2011 at 12:52 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T201 Mecca, T205 Gold, T206 White, OM T210-3 | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 14 | 10-21-2011 07:01 PM |
T205 Lot (12) | vintagecpa | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 10-29-2010 12:09 AM |
E102 Bender, T205 Cobb, Matty, M116, etc for sale/trade | caramelcard | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 10-16-2009 02:27 PM |
FS/FT: T205 cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 11-22-2007 03:19 PM |
T205 and T206 Cards Available | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-06-2007 02:15 PM |