|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I have always thought postwar football was cheap. Except the Namath. It is a tough card and he is a New York Icon. However, I have always thought that the Namath was overpriced. Let's face it, the '65 set is NOT the same as the '52 BB.
Unfortunately football players fade from memory faster than baseball players. Don't believe me? Why is it that you can pick up copies of HOF rookies for next to nothing? I think we agree that there were less football cards printed. So shouldn't even 3rd tier HoFer's cards be a little harder to come by/more expensive?
__________________
I am not tech savvy... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1965 Topps Joe Namath rookie SGC 55 f/s | Akgator1 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2015 09:02 AM |
WTB 1965 Topps Namath Rookie Low Grade | hookem | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 4 | 04-28-2015 08:31 PM |
Joe Namath and the 1965 Topps set | TanksAndSpartans | Football Cards Forum | 15 | 04-15-2015 05:03 PM |
1965 Joe Namath BVG 7.5 *Old flip* Very clean card! | Sean1125 | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 07-24-2013 06:21 PM |
1965 Topps Joe Namath | e107collector | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 10-19-2012 07:51 PM |