NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:07 PM
Theoldprofessor's Avatar
Theoldprofessor Theoldprofessor is offline
John Manning
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 307
Default Biggest grading disappointment?

Everybody feels screwed by grading companies, but some hits are worse than others.

What grading fiasco makes you want to cry? Here's mine... Sure it's off-center, but not as much as others that have no such qualifier. And it's the Babe, and he's the only 9 I own, and why does HE have to be the one? I'd have been happier if he were a 7 (oc).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Babe.jpg (78.1 KB, 468 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:34 PM
teetwoohsix's Avatar
teetwoohsix teetwoohsix is offline
Clayton
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
Posts: 2,461
Default

They just had a post about this recently-I think(imo)you should send that card to SGC for crossover(no,I do not work for them).It is a wonderful looking card,and I hate the OC and MC and MK tags PSA put on their labels.Many probably don't agree with me,but like I said-it's just my opinion.............
Respectfully,Clayton
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:12 PM
cozmokramer's Avatar
cozmokramer cozmokramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 859
Default

OC... or any qualifier should just affect the overall number grade. No need for any designation other than the number
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:54 PM
ghostmarcelle ghostmarcelle is offline
Matt Goebel
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 213
Default

my opinion has always been that the more information the better - so a 9oc is much more descriptive than just EX. But in this age of registrys there just seems to be a huge stigma with qualifiers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:26 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,263
Default

I have never liked the qualifiers...especially the off center(oc). I've seen PSA cards labeled OC that couldnt have been worse than 45-55...left to right or top to bottom...and then you get obvious ones like that ruth. it is a beautiful card...but is definitely oc top to bottom.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2009, 10:28 PM
Thrill-of-the-Hunt Thrill-of-the-Hunt is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 44
Default that grade shouldnt be your only concern

the cards centering top to bottom may yield an sgc 84/7 but not totally sure as it may not measure to their standards. to have Mint corners on that card is amazing, what bothers me is the baggy and unfitted holder, just a sloppy job. you'd think psa could afford a holder that fits better.

did you really think the card would get a straight 9 or were your expectations lower?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:34 PM
kmac32's Avatar
kmac32 kmac32 is offline
Ken McMillan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ponte Vedra, Florida
Posts: 2,509
Default

Had a PSA koester Bread Elmer Miller card rated good that I sent in as Koester Bread and SGC sent it back graded as a W575-1 Elmer Miller poor. Talked with SGC and later found out that on this card they always call them W575-1. I wasn't very happy with SGC for that one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:46 PM
Robextend's Avatar
Robextend Robextend is offline
Rob Miller
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 3,493
Default

Never liked the qualifier, maybe its just me, but whenever I see a qualifier I find myself still trying to assess the "true" grade.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Consistent grading Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 10 09-25-2008 05:09 PM
Grading Compnay Questions Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 0 07-11-2008 03:51 PM
One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 31 01-28-2007 08:04 AM
What is it, exactly, about grading? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 35 07-27-2006 08:42 AM
Starting a Grading Company Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 06-22-2004 10:57 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 PM.


ebay GSB