|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Monster? Really?
I noticed in another thread that someone put a T206 (-2) together in six months. Even collecting every card (excluding backs) all you need is money to make it happen.
How could this set be called a "monster" if it can be assembled so quickly? Of course, I do understand part of the reason is because of how many cards are in the set. I'm not trying to minimize the accomplishment for the collectors going after the set (I may even try it myself someday). But what sets are really a monster? What sets would take many years or even decades to complete? N172 - N175, actually all of the sets from the 1800's?
__________________
Dan |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S T206 The Monster By Bill Heitman - Signed | ledsters | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2010 10:42 AM |
F/S T206 The Monster By Bill Heitman - Signed | ledsters | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-06-2010 11:19 AM |
6 monster boxes full of cards from the 80's and 90's | JMANOS | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-24-2009 01:39 PM |
Heitman's Monster? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-12-2007 01:52 AM |
Accuracy of T206 Monster??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-13-2003 02:46 PM |