NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 12-10-2013, 08:41 AM
jhs5120's Avatar
jhs5120 jhs5120 is offline
Jason S!m@nds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 867
Default

Now that I have finished reading..

I agree with Leon, they are only guilty of small scans.

If I am buying a group of cards that are in PSA/SGC 1 (I used to buy bulk t206 cards in low grade back in the day). I generally expect every single card to be mangled and I bid accordingly.

By SGC's grading criteria, a "1" designation is in "poor" condition. You received cards that were in poor condition. You shouldn't have expected anything better.

On a side note, if this happened to me and it legitimately upset me I would have asked for a $50 refund, not $260. $260 seems like you are trying to pull a fast one on them. The cards aren't worth $260 less because they are a low end 1 instead of a high end 1. They are worth virtually the same.

Why did you expect they would offer you the buyers AND sellers premium back?

Last edited by jhs5120; 12-10-2013 at 08:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 12-10-2013, 10:56 AM
vargha's Avatar
vargha vargha is offline
David Vargha
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Klein View Post
David:

That is a perfect chance to post those scans and let us see the visual evidence.

Rich
The scanner doesn't work on the new computer. I need to move it over to another computer and get this done. Sorry for being a flake about this.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 12-10-2013, 11:01 AM
vargha's Avatar
vargha vargha is offline
David Vargha
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
Now that I have finished reading..

I agree with Leon, they are only guilty of small scans.

If I am buying a group of cards that are in PSA/SGC 1 (I used to buy bulk t206 cards in low grade back in the day). I generally expect every single card to be mangled and I bid accordingly.

By SGC's grading criteria, a "1" designation is in "poor" condition. You received cards that were in poor condition. You shouldn't have expected anything better.

On a side note, if this happened to me and it legitimately upset me I would have asked for a $50 refund, not $260. $260 seems like you are trying to pull a fast one on them. The cards aren't worth $260 less because they are a low end 1 instead of a high end 1. They are worth virtually the same.

Why did you expect they would offer you the buyers AND sellers premium back?
I didn't "expect" anything, which is good, because I received nothing. I asked for them to take the lot back, but I would have at least grudgingly "settled" for them refunding my buyer's premium.

And your assertion that "They are worth virtually the same" is just silliness. I have two people on this board who made offers on the Alexanders. Should I anonymously contact them back and see if they agree with you?
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 01-31-2015, 09:05 PM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is offline
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,511
Default What was the conclusion to this exciting thread?

Inquiring Minds Wants to Know

I was reminded of this thread by the Dean's Card thread
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 02-01-2015, 11:53 AM
tiger8mush's Avatar
tiger8mush tiger8mush is offline
Rob G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Klein View Post
What was the conclusion to this exciting thread?
we're still waiting for scans, due by noon
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? Vegas-guy Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 02-13-2012 11:02 AM
Legendary Auctions - Problem last night Shoeless Moe Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 11-18-2010 05:24 PM
Problem with SCD IronHorse2130 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 10 11-09-2010 05:08 AM
Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank JP Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 74 03-15-2010 06:38 PM
SGC Problem Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 09-07-2008 05:59 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.


ebay GSB